首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
游客
2024-08-01
9
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as a nanny state whose social engineering has gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity (肥胖症) rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic (慢性的) diseases?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor. Because its level of income disparity (差异) is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor than in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim、major tax overhaul 和Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况等,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3701562.html
相关试题推荐
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
SeniorAccountExecutive(总监)Atlanta,aleadingmarketing,design&prod
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词you
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
Inordertostayhealthy,itisagoodidea______yourdoctoratleastonceay
Ibas—CenterofExcellenceIbasisoneoftheworld’sleadingcompaniesinDataR
Exercisescanhelpuskeep(health)______.healthy句子意为:运动可以帮助我们保持健康。本题测试词性变化。kee
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
Readingisagreeableaswellas(health)______tohumanbeings.healthy本题考查语法。根据句子
随机试题
Hebrakedhardand______avoidedaparkedvan.A、onlyB、quiteC、narrowlyD、seldom
FACILITATE:A、gripB、secreteC、sanctifyD、impedeE、hurdleD
[originaltext]ParisattackssuspectSalahAbdeslamhascontactedhislawyer,
钢材试件受拉应力一应变曲线上从原点到弹性极限点称为:A.弹性阶段 B.屈服阶段
通常表明被审计单位在收入确认方面可能存在舞弊风险的迹象通常包括( )。A、被审计
按照《刑法》规定,对集资诈骗罪和非法吸收公众存款罪的法律责任理解正确的有()。
有些南京人不爱吃辣椒,那么有些爱吃甜食的南京人肯定不爱吃辣椒。以以下哪项能保证上
有关药物治疗方案制定的一般原则,错误的说法是A.应考虑患者的依从性,保证治疗的有
某贸易公司为了适应发展需要,通过发行股票、债券、可转换债券等多种方式筹集资金。其
甲企业为增值税一般纳税人,主要从事服装的生产和销售业务。将自产的20000件新
最新回复
(
0
)