首页
登录
职称英语
Non-slick cookware material Teflon has once again landed in the spotlight af
Non-slick cookware material Teflon has once again landed in the spotlight af
游客
2024-06-07
39
管理
问题
Non-slick cookware material Teflon has once again landed in the spotlight after a US independent review board said they believe a chemical used in making it poses more of a cancer risk than previously indicated.
But DuPont, the US-based chemical giant that manufactures Teflon, denied exposure to PFO, an acid, which could pose a health risk to the public.
The findings have not resulted in any substantial impact on the company, a DuPont China Beijing office official, said on Friday.
China’s product quality watchdog said on Friday that it knows about the incident and has not yet decided whether to test the safety of the non-stick surface for the second time in less than a year. In a &aft report released earlier this week, an advisory board that reviewed the US Environmental Protection Agency’s report concluded that PFOA is "likely" to be carcinogenic to humans. The draft was based on tests conducted on animals, and the advisory board mended the US EPA conduct further testing
But a statement released by DuPont on Tuesday said that the company is conducting an employee health study on PFOA and that partial results indicate no association between PFOA exposure and most of the health parameters that were measured. According to Xu Yang, a public relations official with DuPont’s Beijing office, about 5 percent of Chinese families use non-stick flying pans compared with 95 percent in the United States.
Last year, the US EPA said it would fine DuPont for failing to report test results regarding PFOA, but the investigation is under way.
China’s General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine ordered a probe last October, but it detected no PFOA in Teflon cookware. [br] The research findings______.
选项
A、have severely influenced the company’s reputation
B、have made the company suffer a loss of profits
C、have done nothing serious to the company
D、have led the company to improve its products
答案
C
解析
细节理解题。根据第三段“The findings have not resulted in any substantial impact on the company.”即研究结果未对公司产生任何重要影响,因此选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3623274.html
相关试题推荐
Non-slickcookwarematerialTeflonhasonceagainlandedinthespotlightaf
Non-slickcookwarematerialTeflonhasonceagainlandedinthespotlightaf
Non-slickcookwarematerialTeflonhasonceagainlandedinthespotlightaf
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshore,heencounteredcopper-s
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshore,heencounteredcopper-s
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshore,heencounteredcopper-s
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshore,heencounteredcopper-s
Mostgrowingplantscontainmuchmorewaterthanallothermaterialscombin
Mostgrowingplantscontainmuchmorewaterthanallothermaterialscombin
Mostgrowingplantscontainmuchmorewaterthanallothermaterialscombin
随机试题
Inlastweek’sTribune,therewasaninterestingletterfromMr.J.Stewart
[originaltext]Millionsofpeoplearestrugglingtounderstandtheirpaychec
关于外观设计申请文件审查的说法,错误的是()。A.在外观设计专利申请初步审查中,
患者,男,45岁,左上第一磨牙隐裂致急性牙髓炎完善根管治疗后,检查发现后牙咬合紧
2017年8月24日,全国工商联发布《2017中国民营企业500强》榜单,201
韩国居民李呈祥与中国利达房地产公司签订购买合同,购买利达公司在甲市A区开发的易美
根据行政许可法律制度的规定,下列关于税务行政许可实施的表述中,正确的有()。A.
(2016年真题)根据《中华人民共和国合伙企业法》,下列经济主体中,可以成为合伙
(2020年真题)张某为其妻子李某投保时,隐瞒李某健康状况。李某真实健康状况不符
建造师签章文件,不属于石化工程安全与环境管理类的文件( )A.重大风险作业方案审
最新回复
(
0
)