首页
登录
职称英语
Before, whenever we had wealth, we started discussing poverty. Why not now?
Before, whenever we had wealth, we started discussing poverty. Why not now?
游客
2024-06-03
23
管理
问题
Before, whenever we had wealth, we started discussing poverty. Why not now? Why is the current politics of wealth and poverty seemingly about wealth alone? Eight years ago, when Bill Clinton first ran. for president, the Dow Jones average was under 3,500, yearly federal budget deficits were projected at hundreds of billions of dollars forever and beyond, and no one talked about the "permanent boom" or the "new economy." Yet in that more straitened time, Clinton made much of the importance of "not leaving a single person behind." It is possible that similar "compassionate" rhetoric might yet play a role in the general election.
But it is striking how much less talk there is about the poor than there was eight years ago, when the country was economically uncertain, or in previous eras, when the country felt flush. Even last summer, when Clinton spent several days on a remarkable, Bobby Kennedy-like pilgrimage through impoverished areas from Indian reservations in South Dakota to ghetto neighborhoods in East St. Louis, the administration decided to refer to the effort not as a poverty tour but as a "new markets initiative."
What is happening is partly a logical, policy-driven reaction. Poverty really is lower than it has been in decades, especially for minority groups. The most attractive solution to it--a growing economy is being applied. The people who have been totally left out of this boom often have medical, mental or other problems for which no one has an immediate solution. "The economy has sucked in anyone who has any preparation, any ability to cope with modern life," says Franklin D. Raines, the former director of the Office of Management and Budget who is now head of Fannie Mae. When he and other people who specialize in the issue talk about solutions, they talk analytically and long-term: education, development of work skills, shifts in the labor market, adjustments in welfare reform.
But I think there is another force that has made this a rich era with barely visible poor people. ft is the unusual social and imaginative separation between prosperous America and those still left out. It’s simple invisibility, because of increasing geographic, occupational, and social barriers that block one group from the other’s view. [br] The author states that one important reason that we do not talk much about poverty is that ______.
选项
A、no one knows what to do about it
B、poverty really is lower than in the past
C、no one has been left out of the current boom
D、the president is not concerned about the poor
答案
B
解析
细节题。作者从第三段开始分析原因。第三段的第二和第三句话提到经济的整体增长使贫困问题有所缓解。这是人们对贫困问题关注减少的原因之一。故正确答案为B项,其他三个选项文中均未有明确陈述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3617850.html
相关试题推荐
Before,wheneverwehadwealth,westarteddiscussingpoverty.Whynotnow?
Before,wheneverwehadwealth,westarteddiscussingpoverty.Whynotnow?
[originaltext]Yearsagobeforetherewererefrigerators,anicehousewasa
[originaltext]Yearsagobeforetherewererefrigerators,anicehousewasa
[originaltext]Today,IwouldliketobeginbydiscussingearlyEuropeanset
[originaltext]Today,IwouldliketobeginbydiscussingearlyEuropeanset
[originaltext]Yearsagobeforetherewererefrigerators,anicehousewasa
[originaltext]Yearsagobeforetherewererefrigerators,anicehousewasa
NeverbeforeinmylifehaveIseenaman______(如引幽默,竟然把在场的每个人逗笑了).sohumorous
[originaltext]Languageisawaytocommunicatewitheachother.Westarted
随机试题
Americanswithdisabilitiesareawidelydiversegroupofpeoplewithvary
WhydoesthewomantakeTheoreticalDynamicsagain?[br][originaltext]W:Excus
Ifyouvisitabigcityanywhereintheworld,youwillprobablyfindarest
[audioFiles]audio_eusm_j01_218(20099)[/audioFiles]A、Maryisworthyoftheprize
[originaltext]M:PleaseexcusethemessIhaven’thadanytimetoclean.W:Wha
一个web信息系统所需要的进行的测试包括()。①功能测试②性能测试③可用性测试④
在V模型中,(请作答此空)是对概要设计进行验证,()与编码相对应。A.集成测试
A.右上腹部穿透伤或严重挤压伤史,血清淀粉酶增高,肠鸣音减弱或消失 B.左上腹
个人利用企业或金融机构提供的资金垫付,以少量资金提前获得高额消费为目的而进行的资
血液循环中血栓随血流运行发生相应的血管阻塞的过程称之为A、血栓形成 B、血栓运
最新回复
(
0
)