首页
登录
职称英语
A few weeks ago, the Food Standards Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report
A few weeks ago, the Food Standards Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report
游客
2024-05-30
26
管理
问题
A few weeks ago, the Food Standards Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report evaluating nutrient levels in organic versus non-organic foods like fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy products. It is a complete, rigorous piece of research. And they found that, in terms of nutritional content, the differences between organic and non-organic foods are negligible.
As the report states, "... organically and conventionally produced crops and livestock products are broadly comparable in their nutrient content." They did in fact find some nutritional differences between organic and non-organic foods, but concluded that it is "unlikely that these differences in nutrient content are relevant to consumer health."
So here they have a nicely delimited (界定的) study of available research with rigorous standards and a fairly worded conclusion, all publicly available to download and read on the FSA website. The reaction, not surprisingly, was spectacular. The British tabloids alternately gloated (幸灾乐祸) with delight over the comeuppance(赢得的惩罚)of extravagant middle class shopping habits or frivolously attacked the study for insulting the people’s common sense. But it was the reaction of the Soil Association, the leading British organic certification organization, which highlighted just how difficult it can be for good science to be understood.
The Soil Association’s response, published in papers across the land, entirely disregarded the intent of the study and instead argued that organic food is better for the environment and contains less pesticides than non- organic food. But in the very first paragraph of the report, the team states that they aren’t looking at the impact on the environment of organic agriculture or the effect of pesticide use, both of which the FSA has extensively examined in other research. They are specifically looking at nutritional comparison. The Soil Association further argued that the FSA report had ignored studies that showed any benefit of organic food. As Ben Goldacre incisively dissected on his popular blog, Bad Science, the Soil Association’s response was logically flawed and entirely beside the point.
The FSA study is good science and by attacking, rather than endorsing it, the organic lobby in the UK has been plainly unscientific. It’s hardly the right stance for an organization that carries su.ch widespread support from the well-educated, critical-thinking middle classes who choose to eat organic food. Any of the many other reasons to go organic—whether it is to avoid pesticides, to encourage better livestock practices, or to simply eat better tasting food—are sufficient to continue supporting the efforts of organic farmers. By misrepresenting the science and its intent, the Soil Association has damaged its credibility and objectivity, the very attributes that its organic label—a stamp of approval—is intended to convey. [br] The Soil Association’s asserted that the FSA’s report ______.
选项
A、had noticed the impact of organic agriculture on the environment
B、had ignored to examine the effect of pesticide use
C、should be criticized for neglecting the benefit of organic food
D、has entirely disregarded the intent of the study
答案
C
解析
根据题干关键词the Soil Association,response,FSA’s report定位到原文第四段第四句:The Soil Association further argued that the FSA report had ignored studies that showed any benefit of organic food.即英国土壤协会认为FSA的报告忽略了那些表明有机食品具有优越性的研究成果。故选C项。 C项中的neglect和句中的ignore为近义词。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3612063.html
相关试题推荐
Lowself-esteempopsupregularlyinacademicreportsasanexplanationfor
Lowself-esteempopsupregularlyinacademicreportsasanexplanationfor
TheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhassetlimitsfortheradiationpermitt
TheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhassetlimitsfortheradiationpermitt
TheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhassetlimitsfortheradiationpermitt
TheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhassetlimitsfortheradiationpermitt
TheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhassetlimitsfortheradiationpermitt
Agoodwaytogetinformationforessaysandreportsistointerviewpeople
Agoodwaytogetinformationforessaysandreportsistointerviewpeople
Agoodwaytogetinformationforessaysandreportsistointerviewpeople
随机试题
Humanwantsseemendless.Whenastarvingmangetsameal,hebeginstothin
随着电子商务的兴起和网购的流行,快递业(expressdeliveryindustry)应运而生。快递公司提供上门收件服务,收件后就会以尽可能快的速
Itdisgustedhimwhenatheistsattackedreligion;hethoughttheywerevulgar.A、
【S1】[br]【S9】E该题应填入一个名词,该词在句中充当宾语成分。从语境看,美国残疾人法案是为保护残疾人权利设立的,空格所在单词表示该法案所禁止的不利于
肝硬化并发肝门静脉高压症患者典型的临床表现是A.黄疸、腹水、脾大 B.腹水、脾
因合同纠纷提起的诉讼,只能由被告住所地管辖。()
共用题干 患者,男性,41岁。急诊入院,目前处于昏迷状态,患者呼吸时有痰鸣音并
Allpassengersshouldpresenttheir____
在了解X公司及其环境、评估重大的错报风险时,A注册会计师发现X公司2019年度主
下列投资活动中,属于直接投资的是()。A.购买普通股股票 B.购买公司债
最新回复
(
0
)