首页
登录
职称英语
Should Single-Sex Education Be Eliminated?[A]Why is a neuroscie
Should Single-Sex Education Be Eliminated?[A]Why is a neuroscie
游客
2024-04-20
59
管理
问题
Should Single-Sex Education Be Eliminated?
[A]Why is a neuroscientist here debating single-sex schooling? Honestly, I had no fixed ideas on the topic when I started researching it for my book, Pink Brain, Blue Brain. But any discussion of gender differences in children inevitably leads to this debate, so I felt compelled to dive into the research data on single-sex schooling. I read every study I could, weighted the existing evidence, and ultimately concluded that single-sex education is not the answer to gender gaps in achievement—or the best way forward for today’s young people. After my book was published, I met several developmental and cognitive psychologists wnose work was addressing gender and education from different angles, and we published a peer-reviewed Education Forum piece in Science magazine with the provocative title, "The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Education. "
[B]We showed thai three lines of research used to justify single-sex schooling—educational, neuroscience, and social psychology—all fail to support its alleged benefits, and so the widely-held view that gender separation is somehow better for boys, girls, or both is nothing more than a myth.
The Research on Academic Outcomes
[C]First, we reviewed the extensive educational research that has compared academic outcomes in students attending single-sex versus coeducational schools. The overwhelming conclusion when you put this enormous literature together is that there is no clear academic advantage of sitting in all-female or all-male classes, in spite of much popular belief to the contrary. I base this conclusion not on any individual study, but on large-scale and systematic reviews of thousands of studies conducted in every major English-speaking country.
[D]Of course. there’re many excellent single-sex schools out there, but as these careful research reviews have demonstrated, it’s not their single-sex composition that makes them excellent. It’s all the other advantages that are typically packed into such schools, such as financial resources, quality of the faculty, and pro-academic culture, along with the family background and preselected ability of the students themselves that determine their outcomes.
[E]A case in point is the study by Linda Sax at UCLA, who used data froma large national survey of college freshmen to evaluate the effect of single-sex versus coeducational high schools. Commissioned by the National Coalition of Girls’ Schools, the raw findings look pretty good for the funders—higher SAT scores and a stronger academic orientation among women who had attended all girls’ high schools(men weren’t studied). However, once the researchers controlled for both student and school attributes—measures such as family income, parents’ education. and school resources—most of these effects were erased or diminished.
[F]When it comes to boys in particular, the data show that single-sex education is distinctly unhelpful for them. Among the minority of studies that have reported advantages of single-sex schooling, virtually all of them were studies of girls. There’re no rigorous studies in the United States that find single-sex schooling is better for boys, and in fact. a separate line of research by economists has shown both boys and girls exhibit greater cognitive growth over the school year based on the "dose" of girls in a classroom. In fact, boys benefit even more than girls from having larger numbers of female classmates. So single-sex schooling is really not the answer to the current "boy crisis" in education.
Brain and Cognitive Development
[G]The second line of research often used to justify single-sex education falls squarely within my area of expertise; brain and cognitive development. It’s been more than a decade now since the " brain sex movement" began infiltrating(渗入)our schools, and there are literally hundreds of schools caught up in the fad(新潮). Public schools in Wisconsin, Indiana, Florida and many other states now proudly declare on their websites that they separate boys and girls because "research solidly indicates that boys and girls learn differently." due to "hard-wired" differences in their brains, eyes, ears, autonomic nervous systems, and more.
[H]All of these statements can be traced to just a few would-be neuroscientists. especially physician Leonard Sax and therapist Michael Gurian. Each gives lectures, runs conferences, and does a lot of professional development on so-called " gender-specific learning. " I analyzed their various claims about sex differences in hearing, vision, language, math, stress responses, and " learning styles" in my book and a long peer-reviewed paper. Other neuroscientists and psychologists have similarly exposed their work. In short, the mechanisms by which our brains learn language, math, physics, and every other subject don’t differ between boys and girls. Of course, learning does vary a lot between individual students, but research reliably shows that this variance is far greater within populations of boys or girls than between the two sexes.
[I]The equal protection clause of the US Constitution prohibits separation of students by sex in public education that’s based on precisely this kind of " overbroad generalizations about the different talents, capacities, or preferences of males and females. " And the reason it is prohibited is because it leads far too easily to stereotyping and sex discrimination.
Social Developmental Psychology
[J]That brings me to the third area of research which fails to support single-sex schooling and indeed suggests the practice is actually harmful: social developmental psychology.
[K]It’s a well-proven finding in social psychology that segregation promotes stereotyping and prejudice, whereas intergroup contact reduces them—and the results are the same whether you divide groups by race, age, gender, body mass index, sexual orientation, or any other category. What’s more, children are especially vulnerable to this kind of bias, because they are dependent on adults for learning which social categories are important and why we divide people into different groups.
[L]You don’t have to look far to find evidence of stereotyping and sex discrimination in single-sex schools. There was the failed single-sex experiment in California, where six school districts used generous state grants to set up separate boys’ and girls’ academics in the late 1990s. Once boys and girls were segregated, teachers resorted to traditional gender stereotypes to run their classes. and within just three years, five of the six districts had gone back to coeducation.
[M]At the same time, researchers are increasingly discovering benefits of gender interaction in youth. A large British study found that children with other-sex older siblings(兄弟姐妹)exhibit less stereotypical play than children with same-sex older siblings, such as girls who like sports and building toys and boys who like art and dramatic play. Another study of high school social networks found less bullying and aggression the higher the density of mixed-sex friendships within a given adolescent network. Then there is the finding we cited in our Science paper of higher divorce and depression rates among a large group of British men who attended single-sex schools as teenagers, which might be explained by the lack of opportunity to learn about relationships during their formative years.
[N]Whether in nursery school, high school, or the business world, gender segregating narrows our perceptions of each other, facilitating stereotyping and sexist attitudes. It’s very simple: the more we structure children and adolescents’ environment around gender distinctions and separation, the more they will use these categories as the primary basis for understanding themselves and others.
[O]Gender is an important issue in education. There are gaps in reading, writing, and science achievement that should be narrower. There are gaps in career choice that should be narrower—if we really want to maximize human potential and American economic growth. But stereotyping boys and girls and separating them in the name of fictitious(虚构的)brain differences is never going to close these gaps. [br] Studies in social psychology have shown segregating in school education has a negative impact on children.
选项
答案
K
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3564189.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext](20)Studentsseekingsuccessshouldlookformentorsamongr
[originaltext](20)Studentsseekingsuccessshouldlookformentorsamongr
[originaltext]W:MaybeweshouldtakeFrontStreetthismorning.Theradioanno
[originaltext]W:MaybeweshouldtakeFrontStreetthismorning.Theradioanno
[originaltext]W:MaybeweshouldtakeFrontStreetthismorning.Theradioanno
[originaltext]W:MaybeweshouldtakeFrontStreetthismorning.Theradioanno
[originaltext]W:MaybeweshouldtakeFrontStreetthismorning.Theradioanno
[originaltext]W:MaybeweshouldtakeFrontStreetthismorning.Theradioanno
[originaltext]Americanslearnsportsaspartoftheireducation.Theylearn
ShouldWeStillValueCooperation?1.如今的年轻人越来越强调个性发展2.发展个性是否意味着忽视团队合作3.我的观点
随机试题
Whichofthefollowingstatementsistrueaccordingtowhatyouhear?[br][ori
Weighingtoomuchcandamageone’shealth,andobesityisagrowingproblem
关于债券收益率,以下叙述正确的是()。A.不同种类发行人发行的债券之间收益率的
肝气犯胃型胃痛治宜A.柴胡疏肝散加减 B.清中汤加减 C.四君子汤
财政政策的“内在稳定器”作用可以通过政府税收的自动变化实现。当经济繁荣时,失业率
社会工作者介入司法过程自司法判决前的案件审理阶段就已经开始,其主要工作对象包括(
某单位年初无偿为甲村建设一个光伏发电站,每年发电2.5万千瓦时,每千瓦时收益为1
2021年3月12日,《中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和
对项目计算期相同而原始投资不同的两个互斥投资项目进行决策时,适宜单独采用的方法是
下列属于资金业务前台交易操作风险的有()。A.交易员未及时止损,未授权交易或超
最新回复
(
0
)