首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
游客
2024-04-04
19
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The author believes that intelligence testing______.
选项
A、may ease racial confrontation in the United States
B、can encourage black children to keep up with white children
C、may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States
D、can help black parents make decisions about their children’s education
答案
D
解析
根据文章第4段末句和第5段首句“如果任何一种肤色的小孩在学校的成绩不好,弄清楚是由于他的智商低,还是由于其他原因引起的对我们来说似乎很重要;学校和家庭只有弄清楚孩子成绩不好的原因才能帮助孩子”,因此,应选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3540807.html
相关试题推荐
Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoinclude
Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoinclude
Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoinclude
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
随机试题
Ifapersontalksabouthisweakpoints,hislistenerisexpectedtosaysomethi
[originaltext]Majorworldautomakershavealreadyinvestedheavilyinelect
Whogoesfirstandwhofollows,andthe【C1】______towhichwomenare"emancip
劳动密集型企业的末日即将到来,这对中国和世界意味着什么呢?与传统想法不同,这并不代表外国企业会关闭中国的工厂,转战劳动力更便宜的国家。实际上,中国是绝佳的制
关于尿胆原检查,错误的是A.尿胆原在酸性溶液中与对二甲氨基苯甲醛反应,生成樱红色
物业管理从业人员应当掌握的专业知识和技能中,陈了房屋及设备设施管理专业知识和技能
我国《保险法》所规范的是( )。A.社会保险 B.商业保险 C.政策性保险
甲、乙两份看涨期权均以1股A股票为标的资产,且到期时间也相同,甲期权的执行价格为
2010年12月31日,甲公司以银行存款44000万元购入一栋达到
已知男性钩虫感染率高于女性,现欲比较甲、乙两地居民的钩虫感染率,但甲地的人口女多
最新回复
(
0
)