首页
登录
职称英语
Increased Screen Time and Wellbeing Decline in Youth A) Have y
Increased Screen Time and Wellbeing Decline in Youth A) Have y
游客
2024-03-11
22
管理
问题
Increased Screen Time and Wellbeing Decline in Youth
A) Have young people never had it so good? Or do they face more challenges than any previous generation? Our current era in the West is one of high wealth. This means minors enjoy material benefits and legal protections that would have been the envy of those living in the past. But there is an increasing suspicion that all is not well for our youth. And one of the most popular explanations, among some experts and the popular media, is that excessive "screen time" is to blame. (This refers to all the attention young people devote to their phones, tablets and laptops.) However, this is a contentious theory and such claims have been treated skeptically by some scholars based on their reading of the relevant data.
B) Now a new study has provided another contribution to the debate, uncovering strong evidence that adolescent wellbeing in the United States really is experiencing a decline and arguing that the most likely cause is the electronic riches we have given them. The background to this is that from the 1960s into the early 2000s, measures of average wellbeing went up in the US. This was especially true for younger people. It reflected the fact that these decades saw a climb in general standards of living and avoidance of mass societal traumas like full-scale war or economic deprivation. However, the "screen time" hypothesis, advanced by researchers such as Jean Twenge, is that electronic devices and excessive time spent online may have reversed these trends in recent years, causing problems for young people’s psychological health.
C) To investigate, Twenge and her colleagues dived into the "Monitoring the Future" dataset based on annual surveys of American school students from grades 8, 10, and 12 that started in 1991. In total, 1.1 million young people answered various questions related to their wellbeing. Twenge’s team’s analysis of the answers confirmed the earlier, well-established wellbeing climb, with scores rising across the 1990s, and into the later 2000s. This was found across measures like self-esteem, life satisfaction, happiness and satisfaction with individual domains like job, neighborhood, or friends. But around 2012 these measures started to decline. This continued through 2016, the most recent year for which data is available.
D) Twenge and her colleagues wanted to understand why this change in average wellbeing occurred. However, it is very hard to demonstrate causes using non-experimental data such as this. In fact, when Twenge previously used this data to suggest a screen time effect, some commentators were quick to raise this problem. They argued that her causal-sounding claims rested on correlational data, and that she had not adequately accounted for other potential causal factors. This time around, Twenge and her team make a point of saying that they are not trying to establish causes as such, but that they are assessing the plausibility of potential causes.
E) First, they explain that if a given variable is playing a role in affecting wellbeing, then we should expect any change in that variable to correlate with the observed changes in wellbeing. If not, it is not plausible that the variable is a causal factor. So the researchers looked at time spent in a number of activities that could plausibly be driving the wellbeing decline. Less sport, and fewer meetings with peers correlated with lower wellbeing, as did less time reading print media (newspapers) and, surprisingly, less time doing homework. (This last finding would appear to contradict another popular hypothesis that it is our burdening of students with assignment that is causing all the problems.) In addition, more TV watching and more electronic communication both correlated with lower wellbeing. All these effects held true for measures of happiness, life satisfaction and self-esteem, with the effects stronger in the 8th and 10th-graders.
F) Next, Twenge’s team dug a little deeper into the data on screen time. They found that adolescents who spent a very small amount of time on digital devices—a couple of hours a week—had the highest wellbeing. Their wellbeing was even higher than those who never used such devices. However, higher doses of screen time were clearly associated with lower happiness. Those spending 10 - 19 hours per week on their devices were 41 percent more likely to be unhappy than lower-frequency users. Those who used such devices 40 hours a week or more (one in ten teenagers) were twice as likely to be unhappy. The data was slightly complicated by the fact that there was a tendency for kids who were social in the real world to also use more online communication, but by bracketing out different cases it became clear that the real-world sociality component correlated with greater wellbeing, whereas greater time on screens or online only correlated with poorer wellbeing.
G) So far, so plausible. But the next question is, are the drops in average wellbeing happening at the same time as trends toward increased electronic device usage? It looks like it—after all, 2012 was the tipping point when more than half of Americans began owning smartphones. Twenge and her colleagues also found that across the key years of 2013 - 16, wellbeing was indeed lowest in years where adolescents spent more time online, on social media, and reading news online, and when more youth in the United States had smartphones. And in a second analysis, they found that where technology went, dips in wellbeing followed. For instance, years with a larger increase in online usage were followed by years with lower wellbeing, rather than the other way around. This does not prove causality, but is consistent with it. Meanwhile, TV use did not show this tracking. TV might make you less happy, but this is not what seems to be driving the recent declines in young people’s average happiness.
H) A similar but reversed pattern was found for the activities associated with greater wellbeing. For example, years when people spent more time with friends were better years for wellbeing (and followed by better years). Sadly, the data also showed face-to-face socializing and sports activity had declined over the period covered by the survey.
I) There is another explanation that Twenge and her colleagues wanted to address: the impact of the great recession of 2007 - 2009, which hit a great number of American families and might be affecting adolescents. The dataset they used did not include economic data, so instead the researchers looked at whether the 2013 -16 wellbeing decline was tracking economic indicators. They found some evidence that some crude measures, like income inequality, correlated with changes in wellbeing, but economic measures with a more direct impact, like family income and unemployment rates (which put families into difficulties), had no relationship with wellbeing. The researchers also note the recession hit some years before we see the beginning of the wellbeing drop, and before the steepest wellbeing decline, which occurred in 2013.
J) The researchers conclude that electronic communication was the only adolescent activity that increased at the same time psychological wellbeing declined. I suspect that some experts in the field will be keen to address alternative explanations, such as unassessed variables playing a role in the wellbeing decline. But the new work does go further than previous research and suggests that screen time should still be considered a potential barrier to young people’s flourishing. [br] In response to past critics, Twenge and her co-researchers stress they are not trying to prove that the use of digital devices reduces young people’s wellbeing.
选项
答案
D
解析
细节归纳题。定位段第三、四句提到,当特温吉之前用这些数据来暗示屏幕时间的影响时,一些评论员很快提出了这个问题。他们认为,她的这种听起来有因果关联的说法是建立在相关数据的基础上的,并且她也没有充分考虑到其他潜在的因果要素。接下来末句指出,特温吉和她的团队强调,他们并不是试图确立这样的因果关系,而是在评估潜在因素的合理性。题干中的stress是对定位段末句中的make a point of saying,题干中的they are not trying to prove对应定位段末句中的they are not trying to establish,题于是对定位段内容的概括归纳,故答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3525527.html
相关试题推荐
Honeybeepopulationsdeclinedby13.6%overthewinter,accordingtoasurve
Honeybeepopulationsdeclinedby13.6%overthewinter,accordingtoasurve
IncreasedScreenTimeandWellbeingDeclineinYouthA)Havey
IncreasedScreenTimeandWellbeingDeclineinYouthA)Havey
IncreasedScreenTimeandWellbeingDeclineinYouthA)Havey
IncreasedScreenTimeandWellbeingDeclineinYouthA)Havey
IncreasedScreenTimeandWellbeingDeclineinYouthA)Havey
EffectiveFriday,ScreenActorsGuild-AmericanFederationofTelevisionandR
EffectiveFriday,ScreenActorsGuild-AmericanFederationofTelevisionandR
EffectiveFriday,ScreenActorsGuild-AmericanFederationofTelevisionandR
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Whathaveyoubeendoingthesepastfiveyears?W:Howtimef
Angerandotherstrongemotionscantriggerpotentiallydeadlyheartrhythm
高层钢结构建筑的钢梁与钢柱连接方法,目前我国一般采用的是( )。A.焊接连接
关于涉税鉴证业务的说法,正确的是( )A.委托人不按照业务结果进行申报的,涉税专
肾小球性蛋白尿以下列何种蛋白为主A.血红蛋白 B.球蛋白 C.纤维蛋白原
根据《测绘合同》示范文本,造成工期顺延的原因中,乙方不承担赔偿责任的有( )。
当电流断线信号发出时,母差保护仍可继续运行。
案例八:一般资料:求助者,男性,52岁,博士学历,在国外生活。 案例介绍:求助
土石路堤施工松铺厚度控制在()以内,接近路堤设计标高时,需改用土方填筑。A
配对X2检验的备择假设为A.P≠P B.B=C C.P=P D.B≠C
最新回复
(
0
)