首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext]Teachers and students alike have experienced the curious paradox
[originaltext]Teachers and students alike have experienced the curious paradox
游客
2024-03-11
51
管理
问题
Teachers and students alike have experienced the curious paradox that beginners, as a rule, tend to think too little about what they are doing because they think too much about what they are doing. Take, for example, people who are learning to play basketball or the piano. They have to give so much thought and attention to the low-level mechanics of handling the ball or fingering the keys or reading the music, that they are unable to give any thought to the thing that matters—the game, or the music, respectively.
With experts, it’s just the other way around. They’re open to the tactical possibilities and the musical challenges precisely because they’re freed, through skill, from the need to pay attention to the low-level details of how to play. Indeed, when the expert pays attention to the mechanics, this is liable to disrupt performance. This has led some to say that the expert operates in a zone “beyond thought,” in a state of flow. But this is misleading. Expert performance is not beyond thought. Smart basketball players or skilled musicians need to pay close attention to the demands of high performance, to the challenges to be overcome. What they don’t need to do— what would be a distraction— is to have to think about where their fingers are, or how to control the ball while running. It’s not mechanics, but the play itself, that absorbs the expert’s intelligence.
A nice video published online last month sheds light on expertise and the conscious mind. The video reports a new study using an eye-tracking device. It turns out that the less-skilled pianist spends more time looking at her fingers than does the expert who, in contrast, is more likely to be looking at the sheet music, or looking ahead at keys he’s not yet playing. In general, the expert’s gaze was calmer and more stable.
This is not a surprising finding. It supports what we might almost think of as conventional wisdom. But it’s remarkable for all that, nonetheless. The eye tracker gives expert and learning performers a glimpse into what they do without thinking about it. The topic of the nature of skill— and the differences between beginners and experts— has been one of considerable discussion in cognitive science and philosophy.
Questions 16 to 18 are based on the recording you have just heard.
16. What does the speaker say about beginners and expert pianists?
17. What do smart basketball players do according to the speaker?
18. What do we learn about the new study published in an online video?
选项
A、It marks a breakthrough in behavioral science.
B、It adopts a conventional approach to research.
C、It supports a piece of conventional wisdom.
D、It gives rise to controversy among experts.
答案
C
解析
讲座中提到,视频所展示的内容证明了我们的传统观点。因此答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3525264.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Teachersandstudentsalikehaveexperiencedthecuriousparadox
[originaltext]Teachersandstudentsalikehaveexperiencedthecuriousparadox
[originaltext]Teachersandstudentsalikehaveexperiencedthecuriousparadox
[originaltext]W:Sohow’sourpresentationabouttherestructuringofthecompa
[originaltext]W:Sohow’sourpresentationabouttherestructuringofthecompa
[originaltext]W:Sohow’sourpresentationabouttherestructuringofthecompa
[originaltext]W:Sohow’sourpresentationabouttherestructuringofthecompa
[originaltext]W:Wow!IwouldgiveanythingtobemorelikeAudreyHepburn!M:
[originaltext]W:Wow!IwouldgiveanythingtobemorelikeAudreyHepburn!M:
[originaltext]M:Youareheadingforacompletelydifferentworldnowthatyou
随机试题
Theneedforbirthcontrolmethodshasdevelopedfairlyrecently,withthed
肺源性心脏病
根据下列材料,回答下列问题。 材料一左图为长江下游部分地区略图。右图为长江江
蛔虫引起并发症的原因是A:蛔虫寄生小肠并损伤肠黏膜B:蛔虫具有钻孔习性C:成
不能作为气雾剂的抛射剂的是A.氩气 B.氟利昂 C.正丁烷 D.二氧化碳
下列物品中,属于包装用辅助材料的是()。A:纸和纸板品 B:木制容器 C:金
(2019年真题)甲企业以本企业价值1350万元的股权和150万元货币资
(2019年真题)根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程量计算规范》(GB50854-201
在对进度计划进行施工准备的可靠性审查时,应重点审查()。A.施工总工期的安排应
心室肌细胞的有效不应期很长,一直延续到( )。A.收缩期开始 B.收缩期中间
最新回复
(
0
)