首页
登录
职称英语
Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East An
Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East An
游客
2024-02-20
44
管理
问题
Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough established by now that we can move on to the essential question: what’s the damage going to be?
The total bill, if emissions are left unchecked, could reach 20 percent of annual per capita income, says Nicholas Stern, the British economist who led an influential Whitehall-sponsored study. William Nordhaus, a Yale economist, puts his "best guess" at 2.5 percent of yearly global GDP. And according to Dutch economist Richard Tol, the economic impact of a century’s worth of climate change is "relatively small" and "comparable to the impact of one or two years of economic growth".
These estimates aren’t just different—they’re different by an order of magnitude. And while some might dismiss the cost estimates as mere intellectual exercises, they’re intellectual exercises with real impact. The Copenhagen meeting may be a bust, but countries from the United States to China are individually considering cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes, and other policies aimed at curtailing greenhouse gases. To be effective, a tax or cap-and-trade charge would have to force today’s emitters to pay the true "social cost of carbon"—in other words, the amount of damage an extra ton of carbon will cause in the coming centuries.
Figuring out what that cost is, however, is no simple task. That’s largely because most of the bill won’t come due for many decades. A ton of carbon dioxide emitted today will linger in the air for anywhere from one to five centuries. Virtually every cost study shows that, even if economic growth continues apace (快速 地) and there’s no effort to slash emissions, the damage from climate change will be negligible until at least 2075. It could take 100 years before we see noticeably negative effects, and even more before we need to launch massive construction projects to mitigate (减轻) the damage. [br] What can we learn about the present climate change?
选项
A、The damage is somewhat exaggerated.
B、Actions will be taken the moment people realize it.
C、Measures should be taken immediately to tackle it.
D、The negative effects will not be significant for a century.
答案
D
解析
综合推断题。根据定位句可知,气候变化带来的影响至少要到2075年才会显现,而显著的负面影响在一百年之后才能够看到,更多年后我们才会发起大规模建设项目来减轻这种损欠。故D)“一个世纪中,负面影响都不会很明显”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3468308.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Hello,UniversityBooks.TimWeberspeaking.W:Hi,Tim,this
[originaltext]M:Hello,UniversityBooks.TimWeberspeaking.W:Hi,Tim,this
Despitecampaignsaftercampaignsandavarietyofgendersensitizationmeas
Despitecampaignsaftercampaignsandavarietyofgendersensitizationmeas
[originaltext]Manyuniversitystudentsdislikestudyinghistorybecausethe
[originaltext]Manyuniversitystudentsdislikestudyinghistorybecausethe
[originaltext]PoewasborninBostonin1809.HeattendedtheUniversityof
I_____________(获得医生资格)togetherwithmywifebyLondonUniversity30yearsago.
AdetailedandthoroughresearchprojectundertakenbytheOpenUniversityr
AdetailedandthoroughresearchprojectundertakenbytheOpenUniversityr
随机试题
"Cool"isawordwithmanymeanings.Itstraditionalmeaningisusedto【C1】__
LGDisplay,theworld’ssecond-biggestflat-paneldisplaymaker,isbetting
TheInnerClockThatRulesOurLivesGuesswhattimeitis---w
TheCommissionisexpectedtoproposeallowingpeopletochoosewhich(36)t
Expertsineducationandgerontology(老人医学)saythatthenumberofretiredAm
下列哪项不能作为糖尿病确诊的依据A.多次空腹血糖≥7.8mmol/L B.尿糖
痰液黏稠不易咳出者的促进排痰措施为A:指导有效咳嗽 B:拍背与胸壁震荡 C:
A. B. C. D.
某机械设备股份有限公司2017年主要财务数据见下表(单位:亿元)。 根据以
信用社的所有者权益包括()。 A.投资者对信用社的投入资本 B.资本公积金
最新回复
(
0
)