Sometime in the middle of the 15th century, a well-to-do merchant from Londo

游客2024-01-15  10

问题     Sometime in the middle of the 15th century, a well-to-do merchant from London buried more than 6, 700 gold and silver coins on a sloping hillside in Surrey. He was fleeing the War of the Roses and planned to return during better times. But he never did. The coins lay undisturbed until one September evening in 1990,when local resident Roger Mintey chanced upon them with a metal detector, a device used to determine the presence of metals. Mintey’s find—much of which now sits in the British Museum—earned him roughly $ 350,000, enough to quit his job with a small manufacturer and spend more time pursuing lost treasure.
    But digging up the past is controversial in Britain. In many European countries, metal detectorists, or people using metal detectors, face tough regulations. In the U. K., however, officials introduced a scheme in 1997 encouraging hobbyists to report their discoveries(except for those falling under the definition of treasure, like Mintey’s find, which they are required to report)—but allowing them to keep what they find, or receive a reward. Last year, a hidden store was uncovered in a field outside Birmingham. It consists of more than 1,500 gold and silver objects from the seventh century and was valued at more than $ 4.5 million. While local museums hurry to raise enough money to keep the find off the open market, it sits in limbo, owned by the Crown but facing claims by the landowner and the metal detectorist who found it.
    The find marks the latest battleground in the increasingly heated conflict between the country’s 10, 000-20,000 metal detectorists and the museum workers determined to protect its precious old objects.
    Supporters say the scheme stems the loss of valuable information about precious old objects, while opponents argue that metal detectorists don’t report everything.
    The debate centers on the larger question of who owns the past. "There’s been a slow move over the centuries that precious old things belong to us all," says Professor Christopher Chippindale of Cambridge University. But in Britain at least, the temptation of buried treasure could change all that. [br] As for the find outside Birmingham, it is still unclear( ).

选项 A、how much it is worth
B、how it was discovered
C、who is entitled to it
D、what it is made up of

答案 C

解析 事实细节题。题干大意:对于在伯明翰郊区发现的宝藏,它们仍未明确的是( )。文章第二段第六句中的“it sits in limbo”的意思为“这些物件的归属一直未有定论”;接下来的句子讲到“……这些物件虽然为王室所有,但是宝藏所在的土地所有者和宝藏的探测者也在主张他们的权利”。这足以表明:谁拥有这些物件仍未明确,即选项C的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3366031.html
最新回复(0)