For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake,

游客2024-01-13  23

问题 For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists. The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

选项 A、Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
B、Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
C、Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
D、Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
E、A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from and arbitrator.

答案 C

解析 arbitration n.(由争执双方挑选的人所作的)仲裁,公诉outlaw v.言布…非法:逃犯
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3358381.html
最新回复(0)