[img]2018m9s/ct_etoefz_etoeflistz_201808_0012[/img] [br] What does the professor

游客2024-01-03  10

问题 [br] What does the professor imply when she says this?
Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class.
Professor: One of the most noticeable differences between polar regions and tropical regions is the tropical ecosystems are much more diverse in terms of the plants and animals we find there. Now, remember that the farther you are from the equator, the more seasonal fluctuations in temperature there tend to be. So how do you think this affects animals in polar ecosystems in terms of food? Would you like to try to answer this question, John?
Student 1: I would guess that with big changes in seasons and you know, plants dying and animals migrating in the fall, it keeps changing what kinds of foods are available in polar regions.
Professor: Right and with that, the feeding behavior of polar animals. They tend to cover a lot of territory in search of food, and they need to be what we call, generalists, meaning that in their eating habits they’re amazingly flexible. A really good example is the Arctic Fox. It mainly eats smaller mammals.
Student 1: Like mice and rabbits?
Professor: Well yeah, that’s the idea, very small mammals of that sort, but in the summer its diet expands to include migratory birds and especially their eggs, as well as insects and even berries. It also feeds on seals or anything else that polar bears have killed and left behind, so the Arctic Fox’s definitely a generalist that’s pretty hard to categorize according to one particular type of food. Now, in the tropics, temperatures are much more stable, so what does that mean to animals in ecosystems there? Any ideas, Ann?
Student 2: Well, with temperatures about the same year round, their food sources would probably be much more stable too, so they wouldn’t have to keep adapting their feeding behavior to changing conditions.
Professor: Right, and typically these animals survive perfectly fine on just one or two food sources. They’ve become what we call specialists; living in one small part of the habitat, feeding on one particular kind of food. There’s a South American bird, for example, called the Yellow Eared Parrot that lives in Colombia, not far from the equator. It’s mostly green with patches of yellow feathers on the sides of its head near its ears. Anyway, this yellow-eared parrot nests in one particular species of palm tree: the wax palm, and it’s very picky about what it eats, mainly the fruit of the wax palm.
Student 2: But you said there’s more diversity in tropical ecosystems. I mean just because an animal prefers one special kind of food, why does that lead to more diversity?
Professor: Good question. What happens is that in the tropics with each species more or less specializing in a particular type of food, they’re more likely to divide up the ecological resources, so each little bit of the habitat essentially becomes a microhabitat that supports the species uniquely suited to thrive on the food and in the living space that this microhabitat provides. So in this kind of ecosystem, you end up with lots of microhabitats and lots of different species that are not competing with each other much at all. There’s a place for everyone.
Student 2: So the generalist species cover a lot of territory, but the specialists?
Professor: Unlike the generalists, they don’t need to.
Ok, now here’s a question to consider. Based on what we’ve been saying, in which kind of ecosystem, polar or tropical, would you expect species to have a better chance of survival?
Student 1: I guess that an animal species would have a better chance of surviving in the tropics.
Professor: Why do you think that?
Student 1: Well, if they each have their own little microhabitat with no competition for food or whatever, they don’t have to worry about much.
Professor: Right, that’s what you might think, except there is a downside to being a specialist. Can anyone think of what that might be?
Student 2: Well, like you said, they each have their own microhabitat. So what might happen if the microhabitat changes or disappears?
Professor: You’re on the right track!
Student 2: And if they can eat only one kind of food and that food grows in only one particular microhabitat, well, if that microhabitat disappears, they’re out of luck. They might all starve and the species could die out.
Professor: Right, extinction is a real threat. There are a lot of threatened species that are on the brink of extinction that live in tropical regions. They are mostly specialists whose microhabitat is being destroyed, often due to human activities. This was certainly true of the yellow-eared parrot, less so now that the wax palms are legally protected, but it’s definitely something to think about.

选项 A、The student has not understood her question.
B、The student’s conclusion is logical but inaccurate.
C、The student has guessed correctly.
D、The student’s explanation is surprisingly original.

答案 B

解析 推论题。线索词为教授所说:that’s what you might think…对于学生回答,老师的反应分为两个方面——支持或反对。本文中教授用隐性让步词might来引出对学生回答的反对态度。A选项与原文矛盾,文中学生理解并回答了教授提问,只是答案不正确而已。答案正确与否跟理不理解是两码事。C选项与原文相反。D选项错误,因为在原文中教授并未持有惊讶语气,且未提及学生的解释是否独创和新颖。针对此题,建议大家要提高对隐性让步词的敏感度,例如:might,sound like,seem like等等,因为让步之后的转折逻辑关系是核心考点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3329053.html
最新回复(0)