With 2005 fast becoming "the year of the natural disaster" , it is time to r

游客2024-01-01  19

问题     With 2005 fast becoming "the year of the natural disaster" , it is time to reflect on how engineering, science and technology can play their fullest part in protecting the planet.
    Long before the Asian tsunami struck, the science community predicted the particular region of Indonesia to be hit by the next big earthquake; and the engineering and technology community had developed early warning systems costing only $30 million. But no government in the region heeded the warnings and no early warning systems were in place. We ignored technology of the advance warnings at our peril of 100,000 victims of the tsunami.
    Governments are not alone in ignoring the views of their scientific community; the public too has its doubts. Part of the reason for this lack of confidence must be down to the failure to engage them in a meaningful way about their concerns. Trust is a two-way street. Instead of claiming that everything would be rosy in the scientific garden " if only the public understood" , we must work hard to explore concerns, discover fears and delve deep into the depths of public perceptions. We are getting there. There is a growing realization that effective public engagement is of far greater value than banging the "public understanding" drum.
    There are still doubters, of course, and sadly their cause is helped whenever they come across opinions presented as fact. All of us must guard against this debilitating practice. In time, effective public engagement should help deliver improved trust as well as better policy, which — in turn — might make it more difficult for scientists’ warnings to be ignored.
    Today’s technology community is a triumph of international collaboration where engineers and scientists combine to develop solutions to our biggest problems. Of course, technology cannot stop natural disasters but it can mitigate their impact. We are able to identify the birds affected by avian flu. We can chart their migration patterns around the world. We have the means to pursue vaccines. And we have the communication channels to keep people informed.
    Extolling the virtues of technology is not to pretend technology is perfect in every regard. Far from it. The profligate and unsustainable use of technology in energy and transport has contributed to climate change. But that doesn’t mean technology has failed us. We must never lose sight of the fact that technology itself will deliver the solutions to the very problems it can create. If we do, technology will remain sidelined and undervalued, and this major social failure will progressively disadvantage us all.
    Our vision is of a society embracing technology as a weapon of both progress and defense. Since the beginning of civilization, we have relied on it and enjoyed its benefits — and most new technologies have had hugely beneficial effects for most people. But now, in an age when the death toll from natural disasters is increasing year on year, with more people living in danger zones, it is ever more urgent that we rely on science and technology to warn us of the dangers to come and provide the solutions we need. [br] Which of the following is the idea stressed in the last paragraph?

选项 A、Technology is a weapon of both progress and defense.
B、People have relied on technology and enjoyed its benefits.
C、Natural disasters are increasing year by year.
D、It is science and technology that we rely on to predict dangers to come and provide solutions needed.

答案 D

解析 是非题型最后一段的内容是:我们想象的社会是一个将科技作为继续进步和防卫两者兼容的武器。自有文明以来,我们一直依靠科技并享受它所带来的好处——大多数新的科技为大多数人带来了巨大的有益影响。但在如今这样一个死于自然灾难的人数逐年增加的时代,更多的人生活在危险地带,我们对于科技的依赖就更迫切了,我们依赖它来预示即将到来的危险并提供我们所需的解决方法。最后一句与全文重点相一致的,也是本段所要强调的。因此D为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3323780.html
最新回复(0)