首页
登录
职称英语
It was two years ago today that the hunting ban came into force, supposedly
It was two years ago today that the hunting ban came into force, supposedly
游客
2023-12-31
56
管理
问题
It was two years ago today that the hunting ban
came into force
, supposedly ending centuries of tradition. However, the law has been an unmitigated failure—not that either side is shouting about it.
It was a nightmare vision that struck fear and
loathing
into the hearts of millions. When the hunting ban became law, it was said, 16, 000 people would lose their jobs, thousands of hounds would be put down, rotting carcasses would litter the countryside, hedgerows would disappear, riders would face on-the-spot fines, law-abiding people from doctors to barristers would be dragged from their horses and carted off to prison, while dog owners would be
prosecuted
if their mutt caught a rabbit.
These were just some of the claims as desperate countryside campaigners battled to save their sport in the lead—up to the hunting ban, which Labour rammed into law using the Parliament Act on November 18, 2004.
For many, the fears were real. Others exaggerated as they fought an increasingly aggressive anti-hunting lobby which had rejected acres of independent evidence affirming that hunting is the most humane way of killing foxes. In the battle to"fight prejudice, fight the ban" , every emotive argument was deployed.
For its part, the anti-hunting brigade extravagantly claimed that the ban would put an end to the rich parading in red jackets. A senior Labour MP, Peter Bradley, admitted in this newspaper that it was, as many suspected, about " class war". He lost his seat shortly afterwards. But people in red coats did not disappear.
In fact, none of the forecasts came true. What did happen was something nobody had predicted : the spectacular revival and growth of hunting with hounds. In short, the hunting ban has been a failure.
Today, on the second anniversary of the ban’ s coming into force on February 18, 2005 , new figures show that participation in the sport has never been higher. It is so cheerful that two new packs have been formed, something that has not happened for centuries.
They include the seductively named Private Pack, set up by the financier Roddy Fleming in Gloucestershire. It operates on an invitation—only basis, a sort of hunting private members’ club. This can only mean one thing: like it or not, hunting is cool. Young people are taking it up, enticed by the element of
rebellion
and the mystique of what actually happens as hunts attempt to keep within the law. [br] Those who break the hunting ban would______.
选项
A、lose their jobs
B、bring shame to their fellow people
C、have to kill their horses and dogs
D、face either fines or imprisonment
答案
D
解析
根据第二段的内容“riders would face on—the—spot fines,law-abiding people from doctors to barristers would be dragged from their horses and carted off to prison,while dog ownerswould be prosecuted if their mutt caught a rabbit.”可知D项“面临罚款或监禁”符合题意。A项“失去工作”,B项“给朋友带来耻辱”,C项“不得不杀掉他们的马和狗”,这三项明显和第二段内容不符合。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3322460.html
相关试题推荐
Spidersestablishseparatehuntinggroundsand______differentstrategiesforca
JunkHunting淘旧货An
JunkHunting淘旧货An
JunkHunting淘旧货An
JunkHunting淘旧货An
Itwastwoyearsagotodaythatthehuntingbancameintoforce,supposedly
Itwastwoyearsagotodaythatthehuntingbancameintoforce,supposedly
Itwastwoyearsagotodaythatthehuntingbancameintoforce,supposedly
Itwastwoyearsagotodaythatthehuntingbancameintoforce,supposedly
Itwastwoyearsagotodaythatthehuntingbancameintoforce,supposedly
随机试题
【S1】[br]【S2】HThose,Others和Stillothers提示三句内容并列,都是美国大学的优势。而后面的which修饰的就是空格所填词,能
[originaltext]DoyoumindifIopenthewindow?[/originaltext]A、Notatall,go
下列关于生物电的叙述中,错误的是()。A.感受器电位和突触后电位的幅度可随刺
不属于人体实验的道德原则是A.知情同意的原则 B.符合科学的原则 C.符合受
施工成本分析的依据有()。A.会计核算 B.业务核算 C.统计核算 D.
女性,43岁。排尿费力5年,近3个月反复发生尿潴留。无外伤及糖尿病史。首先要考虑
A.新鲜晨尿沉渣找细胞核内包涵体 B.下睑结膜刮片姬姆萨染色找胞浆包涵体 C
( )反映了月度进出港口各类货物数量以及港口月度生产任务,是港口组织生产的主要
基于应用型学习风格的课程设计,不适合采用()。A.案例教学 B.角色扮演
根据《期货市场客户开户管理规定》,()应当登录统一开户系统办理客户交易编码的注
最新回复
(
0
)