首页
登录
职称英语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, b
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, b
游客
2023-12-31
20
管理
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left. [br] The word "municipal" underlined in Paragraph 1 means______.
选项
A、governmental
B、organizational
C、cosmopolitan
D、institutional
答案
C
解析
词义界定。municipal出现在第一段第一句“Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial”,大意是市政府在餐馆和酒吧禁烟引起了高度争议。假如有读者不认识municipal,从restaurants and bars可以判断其环境。如果依然不确定,可继续往下读。第二段提到了New York City,就是市政府的例子。如果还不确定,可以继续读到这一句“should the government really have to tell us what to do”,即是政府下令禁烟。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3320817.html
相关试题推荐
Scientistshavediscoveredaclose______betweensmokingandseveralseriousdise
Ifyoudon’t______smoking,you’11nevergetbetter.A、giveoffB、giveoutC、give
Iwouldrecommendthisinnhighlyonaccountofitswonderfullocation.A、asare
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Parapsychology,whichaverycontroversialfieldis,hasattractedarelatively
Sallyappearsbeingahardtimeconvincingherhusbandtogiveupsmoking.A、tob
随机试题
Accordingtothespeaker,thedry-cleaningstoreusedtobea______.[br][ori
Themostpopularorganicgemisthepearl.Apearlistheresponseofamari
根据《专利法》的规定,在太平洋海底发现的锰核不能授予专利权。()
A.肝脏左叶增大,右叶萎缩,肝实质被网状高回声分隔,呈"地图样"改变 B.肝实
一个不计厚度的圆柱型无盖透明塑料桶,桶高2.5分米,底面周长为24分米,AB为底
新发现和从国外引种的药材,需要经过哪个部门审核批准A:国家质量监督检验检疫总局
新投运或维修后构支架的巡视:构支架无异常(),防腐涂层无()。构支架金具、连接螺
垄断资本主义发展的主要阶段包括()。A.私人垄断资本主义 B.商业垄断资本主
男,20岁,性格内向。2年来无明显诱因害怕与人交往,与人谈话时就脸红、心慌、手抖
阵发性室上性心动过速治疗
最新回复
(
0
)