首页
登录
职称英语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, b
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, b
游客
2023-12-31
19
管理
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left. [br] The word "municipal" underlined in Paragraph 1 means______.
选项
A、governmental
B、organizational
C、cosmopolitan
D、institutional
答案
C
解析
词义界定。municipal出现在第一段第一句“Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial”,大意是市政府在餐馆和酒吧禁烟引起了高度争议。假如有读者不认识municipal,从restaurants and bars可以判断其环境。如果依然不确定,可继续往下读。第二段提到了New York City,就是市政府的例子。如果还不确定,可以继续读到这一句“should the government really have to tell us what to do”,即是政府下令禁烟。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3320817.html
相关试题推荐
Scientistshavediscoveredaclose______betweensmokingandseveralseriousdise
Ifyoudon’t______smoking,you’11nevergetbetter.A、giveoffB、giveoutC、give
Iwouldrecommendthisinnhighlyonaccountofitswonderfullocation.A、asare
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Parapsychology,whichaverycontroversialfieldis,hasattractedarelatively
Sallyappearsbeingahardtimeconvincingherhusbandtogiveupsmoking.A、tob
随机试题
We_____lastnight,butwewenttotheconcertinstead.A、musthavestudiedB、migh
Organicfarmershadfoughttopreventgenetically-engineeredcropsfrombein
Nowletuslookathowweread.Whenwereadaprintedtext,oureyesmove
What%theword"saying"(Line1,Para1)inthispassagemean?[br]Whatisextre
(2020年真题)企业计划筹措资金进行固定资产升级改造。筹措方案分别为增发股票、
商业银行下列金融创新行为中,符合客户利益保护原则的是( )。A.损害客户利益不
四环素类抗生素能和金属离子形成红色配位化合物的依据为A.分子结构中具有二甲氨基B
我国宪法规定,公民享有的政治权利和自由包括()。 A.言论自由B.平等权
胆固醇在体内的主要生理功能是A.影响基因表达 B.合成磷脂的前体 C.控制胆
根据《建设工程安全生产管理条例》,施工现场及毗邻区域内供水、排水、供电、供气、供
最新回复
(
0
)