首页
登录
职称英语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. Wha
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. Wha
游客
2023-12-26
56
管理
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection. Modern scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward.
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp
wedges
, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams.
Clams
were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modern clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa. In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths — some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens — clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano. [br] With regard to Gould and Calloway’s theory of evolution, the author would most likely state that it______.
选项
A、has not yet been tested as much as the previous model
B、rules out the possibility that one species could cause the extinction of another
C、puts the status of humans in a new perspective
D、attaches less importance to the effect of natural disasters
答案
C
解析
推断题。本题是推断作者对古尔德和卡洛韦的进化论的看法,本文首段就在探讨进化的观点决定着人类在整个进化过程中所处的位置,提出一部分科学家认为竞争理论是人类进化得以愈发完美的动力,但是后文中出现的古尔德和卡洛韦的理论则对这种观点提出质疑。由此可见他们的进化论是从一个新的视角来审视人类的地位,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3306323.html
相关试题推荐
WheneverIfeeldepressed,Iwouldliketodosomethinglikewashingclothes,or
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thegoodthingwasthateverytimehecanceledhepromisedsomethingelse,somet
Amanwhopubliclysayssomethingdefamatoryaboutsomeoneisreferredtoasad
随机试题
[originaltext]Banker’sacceptancesoftenariseinforeigntrade.Abusines
[originaltext]M:Idon’tknowwhattodowithTimmy.ThismorningIfoundorang
运量增加,运输总支出()。A.增加 B.减少 C.不变 D.无法判断
按照规定,开挖深度超过5m(含5m)的基坑,槽的土方开挖工程应当编制专项施工方案
注:1、部分数据因四舍五入的原因,存在总计与分项合计不等的情况。
有关肾脏对尿酸的排泄的说法错误的是A.近端肾小管重吸收98%的滤过尿酸B.近端肾
对异丙嗪,错误的是A、有止吐作用 B、有明显的中枢抑制作用 C、能抑
运维班应根据变电站巡视检查项目和周期,制定智能巡检机器人巡视任务和巡视周期。一类
下列关于增值税计税依据的说法,错误的是()。A.还本销售方式销售货物的,不
男性,24岁,发热2个月余,体温37.5~38℃,食欲不振,咳嗽,咳少量白痰。胸
最新回复
(
0
)