首页
登录
职称英语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. Wha
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. Wha
游客
2023-12-26
23
管理
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection. Modern scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward.
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp
wedges
, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams.
Clams
were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modern clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa. In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths — some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens — clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano. [br] According to Gould and Calloway’s theory, the decline of brachiopods______.
选项
A、resulted from their competition with clams
B、seemed to have been caused by an environmental impact
C、were not triggered by a comet crashing down from the heavens
D、might be the consequence of mass deaths in the Permian period
答案
B
解析
推断题。第3段第5句指出当今蛤类比腕足动物多得多的原因似乎是二叠纪时期大规模死亡的结果,选项D待定。第3段最后一句提到了可能会导致大规模死亡的原因,生态变化、地质变化或彗星撞地球,这些都是环境的变化,由此可以排除D选项,确定正确答案B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3306319.html
相关试题推荐
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Wha
Thegoodthingwasthateverytimehecanceledhepromisedsomethingelse,somet
Amanwhopubliclysayssomethingdefamatoryaboutsomeoneisrefferedtoasad
Ifyou________tosomething,youmentionitinaveryindirectway,oryoujustb
随机试题
Inall(probable)______hewillgowithyou.probability
Everysecond,1hectare(公顷)oftheworld’srainforestisdestroyed.That’s
Madagascar’sMahafalecattleraisershaveincorporatedthepricklypearcact
【教学过程】 环节一:课堂导入 多媒体播放视频《升国旗仪式》并带领同学们齐唱国歌 教师提问:面对国旗,听着国歌,你们有什么感想?为什么?对身边的人和
下列属于火灾自动报警系统组件更换步骤的有()。A.确定故障点位置 B.查找故
咽的下界是位于()A.第7颈椎上缘水平 B.第4颈椎下缘水平 C
水库防护工程按功能可分为( )。A.导流引水 B.筑堤挡水 C.填筑抬高
A.上肢内侧前缘B.上肢内侧中线C.上肢内侧后缘D.上肢外侧前缘E.上肢外侧后缘
患者,男,22岁,大学生。自幼胆小内向,学习成绩较好。6周前因迟到,老师批评后急
2013年12月26日,中国社科院和社会科学文献出版社共同发布的《社会蓝皮书》显
最新回复
(
0
)