首页
登录
职称英语
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone
游客
2023-12-25
42
管理
问题
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone they’ve seen commit a crime, seven Euclid residents claim to have "witnessed" the encounter between Officer Michael Amiott and driver Richard Hubbard III by virtue of viewing a four-minute video on Facebook. Their unique argument has triggered discussion in the legal community about the role that "social media witnesses" could play in such cases.
"It used to just be the police officer’s word against the victim’s word," notes lead petitioner Richard T. Montgomery II. "Now, in the age of cellphone videos and social media, we as a community have the opportunity to participate in ensuring police accountability."
The racially and economically diverse group scored its first victory in late December when a municipal judge responded to its request by requiring the Cuyahoga County prosecutor to investigate Amiott for felonious assault during the August 2017 traffic stop.
The cellphone video, which has more than 11 million views on Facebook, shows the officer repeatedly punching Hubbard’s head as the 25-year-old man lay in the street. Separate video from a police cruiser’s dash cam shows Amiott wrestling Hubbard to the ground moments after he was ordered out of his car for a suspended driver’s license.
Amiott was fired two months later for excessive force. But in the majority-black city, emotions flared anew this October when he was rehired following an arbitrator’s ruling in his favor. The ensuing outcry included the NAACP announcing a travel advisory to people of color who might be driving through Euclid.
The legal issues raised by the citizens’ petition and the prospect of witnesses via social media are largely untested.
Cleveland attorney Rebecca Maurer, who wrote a popular blog about the "Serial" podcast’s recent focus on Cuyahoga County’s criminal justice system, expects such witnesses might have to first establish that they were somehow personally affected before being allowed to initiate charges.
"The judicial system relies on the idea of ’standing’ to regulate the type of cases that go to court," she said. "A judge who borrows from standing theory will want to know exactly why social media witnesses should initiate the case. Perhaps it’s enough if the petitioners are local residents claiming a personal stake in the security of their community."
In his ruling referring the matter to the county prosecutor, Euclid Municipal Judge Patrick Gallagher did point out that the petitioners fail to claim any "personal knowledge of Mr. Hubbard’s injuries." Had they done so, he could have taken more
drastic
action, the judge seemed to imply. Under Ohio law, Gallagher also could have used the citizens’ petition to circumvent the prosecutor’s office and issue an arrest warrant for Amiott.
Nearly a dozen other states also allow private citizens to initiate criminal charges — including Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas and Idaho.
In all but one, however, the decision to actually file criminal charges is left to a prosecutor or grand jury. The exception is South Carolina, where police also have that power.
Testimony from people claiming to have witnessed something via social media can be problematic, cautions Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina law professor and former officer, since video posted online, even unedited, often provides limited information about an event.
"Beyond what they see directly in front of them, officers also rely on peripheral, aural and tactile information ... That doesn’t always come across accurately, or at all, on video," said Stoughton, who writes extensively about police regulation and use of force. By definition, he added, social media witnesses will always have such limitations.
Some attorneys worry that the very community such individuals hope to protect could instead be negatively affected. Civil rights lawyer Maya Wiley, a former board chair of the NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board, an independent police oversight agency, warns of implicit bias in the criminal justice system that could favor a white social media witness over one of color. [br] The most proper title for this passage is______.
选项
A、Citizen’s Petition Against a White Policeman
B、The Power of Social Media Over Legal Community
C、Social Media "Witnesses" Raise Questions for Legal System
D、Social Media "Witnesses" Are Not Acceptable
答案
C
解析
主旨题。全文从社交媒体证人提起诉讼的事件说起,讨论了该行为给司法系统带来的问题,故正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3305465.html
相关试题推荐
Theremusthavebeensomeonewhohasinstigatedarebellionbecausethepeoplea
ProfessorSmithissomeoneweall______.A、lookuptoB、lookintoC、lookthrough
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Hehasneverworriedabouthispropertiesbecausehehas______themagainstdisas
Individualsexposedtoloudnoiseforlongintervalsmaysuffertemporaryorper
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
TheblunderofArgentina’sgoaliecostthemthegameinthematchagainstBrazil
随机试题
Haven’tItoldyouIdon’twantyoukeeping______withthoseawfulriding-aboutb
DealingwithCriticismA)Noonelikesgettingcriticism.
ThreeMainLiteraryFormsⅠ.PoetryEssentialf
Hello,welcometo“ThisWeek’sSports”.Itwillbe9:00a.m.whentheLosA
根据《公路工程建设项目概算预算编制办法》,属于建筑安装工程费专项费用的有( )
银行要稳健、审慎经营,持有的账面资本应()经济资本。A.小于 B.等于
下列对预算定额的描述中,正确的是()。A.预算定额是计价定额 B.预算定额有
关于羟甲戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制药,下列说法错误的是A.最初从微生物发酵得到 B
当月业务全部处理完毕,在采购管理模块月末结账的前提下,可执行应付管理模块的()功
决定一个人适应环境的独特的行为模式和思维方式,是个人比较稳定的心理特征的总和称之
最新回复
(
0
)