2. 职称英语
  3. After 45 years of the queen’s rule, James I succeeded Elizabeth I to the Eng

After 45 years of the queen’s rule, James I succeeded Elizabeth I to the Eng

游客2023-12-25  7
问题     After 45 years of the queen’s rule, James I succeeded Elizabeth I to the English throne in 1603, at which point the English economy was struggling. The population of England was swelling, food production was insufficient, and prices were high. Despite its instability, a few industries brought reliable income to the English economy. In particular, many merchants relied on the export of cloth to continental Europe. For the first decade of James I’s reign, the cloth trade prospered and was an important source of revenue for the English. However, the king was to make a serious mistake that would eventually lead to the fall of the English cloth trade.
    In 1614, William Cockayne, an English merchant and politician, proposed that James I make a dramatic change to the way the English exported cloth. At the time, the English produced primarily unfinished cloth. This meant that they sold cloth that had not been dyed, bleached, or otherwise processed. Most often, companies in the Netherlands bought the plain cloth from England and finished it themselves. The Dutch were experts in the complex procedures and technologies required to finish cloth, and these procedures add significant value to the unfinished cloth they had purchased from England. As a result, Dutch cloth companies could sell their goods at much higher prices than the English could. Hoping to transfer these profits to English companies, Cockayne proposed that the English finish the cloth themselves to increase the value of their cloth exports. He also asked James I to establish a company, which was to function under Cockayne’s leadership, that would control and monopolize the export of finished cloth to continental Europe. The king was in need of money, and the prospect of increased revenue appealed to him. Thus, he agreed to Cockayne’s plan and, per Cockayne’s request, founded the King’s Merchant Adventurers, a company with a primary purpose of exporting finished cloth.
    However, Cockayne’s plan disrupted the previously steady English cloth trade and was ultimately ineffective for a number of reasons. First, James I’s support of Cockayne’s company created a rift between the king and many powerful English merchants, particularly the members of the unfinished cloth company called the Merchant Adventurers, which had been cast aside in favor of Cockayne’s group. Furthermore, the Dutch, who had previously been Europe’s main supplier of finished cloth, responded to English competition by refusing to purchase any English cloth products, and many other European nations did the same. In addition, merchants in other countries refused to ship English cloth or charged English business people inflated fees for shipping. The resistance from abroad was particularly damaging to the King’s Merchant Adventurers because it could not afford the ships that were necessary to transport its goods to European markets.
    In addition to the difficulties caused by its widespread unpopularity, Cockayne’s company was unable to produce quality goods. For one, Cockayne did not have the funds to acquire the machines needed to finish cloth. Moreover, English cloth makers were not experts in the finishing process and could not match the high-quality finished cloth produced by their competitors in the Netherlands. By 1617, just three years after the company was established, James I had dissolved the King’s Merchant Adventurers. [br] According to the fourth paragraph, which of the following was a factor in the King’s Merchant Adventurer’s inability to create quality goods?
选项 A、It did not have financial support from the king.
B、It couldn’t afford to pay cloth-finishing experts.
C、Its employees didn’t have the necessary knowledge about finishing cloth.
D、It had an inadequate supply of unfmished cloth.
答案 C
解析 第4段倒数第2句提到，科凯恩的公司无法生产出高质量的产品还在于英国的布匹制造商并不是加工工艺方面的专家(English cloth makers were not experts in the finishing process)，说明英国的布匹加工人员并没有掌握布匹加工方面的重要知识，因此生产出的产品无法与荷兰的相媲美，故C项“员工没有掌握布料加工必备的知识”正确。上文提到科凯恩的计划获得了国王的支持，因此A项“没有周王的财政支持”与文章内容不符，可排除。B项“付不起布料加工专家的工资”和D项“未加工的布料供应不足”在文中均未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304659.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)