首页
登录
职称英语
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released
游客
2023-12-21
97
管理
问题
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps generally make the same unhealthy food choices as everyone else in America. Too many sweets, salty snacks and prepared desserts, junk food, in other words. But when it came to soda and its sugary ilk, the results were more surprising, and not in a good way. According to the USDA-funded study, shoppers using food stamps spent a larger share of their budget—9.25% to be exact—on sugar-sweetened beverages than other shoppers. Even more startling: Food-stamp shoppers bought more soda than any other single grocery item.
The new data revived an old debate about banning soda from the $71-billion food-stamp program. In February, the House Agriculture Committee held a hearing to gather testimony about the pros and cons of such a restriction. It does seem counterproductive to spend billions of taxpayer dollars in an effort to improve the nutrition of low-income Americans on a product with little or no nutritional value. It is called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, after all. And soda had been identified as one of the prime culprits in soaring U.S. obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates.
The study and committee debate raised some of the same uncomfortable issues that have caused the proposal to languish in the past. On the conservative side, folks have worried that this type of nannystate regulation will lead to other heavy-handed health-related restrictions. Liberals, meanwhile, have been concerned that it is patronizing and punitive to tell people how to spend their government benefits. Add in the opposition from beverage industry lobby and it’s no surprise this idea hasn’t gotten very far when it’s been proposed. In recent years, a handful of states and cities have tried to impose such a requirement, but were blocked by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The difference now is that the attitude toward soda has rapidly soured as more evidence has poured in that beverages with added sugars are making people fat and sick. The USDA has issued dietary guidelines warning people to limit their consumption of food with added sugars, the largest sources of which are sweetened beverages. This belief helped San Francisco, Philadelphia and handful of other cities push through new taxes on soda. A handful more are considering their own soda levies.
We know that there are detrimental health effects of drinking lots of soda, but we don’t know if barring SNAP recipients from spending their benefits on soda will really improve their health. It’ s worth finding out by undertaking a limited pilot program, regardless of the qualms we may have about imposing restraints on the poor that better-off Americans don’t face. The assumption is that those billions of dollars not going to buy Coke will be spent on healthier food. But that may not be the case. What if consumption of other sugary items increases? Or if SNAP recipients simply transferred their sweet drink habit ounce-for-ounce to more expensive and still sugar-laden fruit juice? Or if they spent their non-SNAP money on soda? Before making a permanent change, we need to know if it would improve nutrition or be pointlessly punitive.
But it is a good step to take to gather data. And the argument that it would be too hard on grocers to carve out sugary drinks doesn’t hold water. As the study shows, modern grocery check stand technology is sophisticated enough to easily separate out purchases by UPC code. Indeed, SNAP already comes with restrictions on alcohol, tobacco and hot foods. Grocers don’t have a problem sorting them out. The Women, Infant and Children food-assistance program is even more prescriptive, permitting only specific items to be purchased: milk, cheese, cereal and formula, for example, but absolutely nothing with added sugar or artificial sweetener. Ideally, a pilot program would also find ways to improve access to safe drinking water. Denying poor people the ability to use food aid to buy a Coke on a hot day may raise some unsettling questions. Yet the findings in the USDA’s study about excessive soda consumption shouldn’t be ignored. [br] The expression "nannystate regulation" (para.3)______.
选项
A、reveals the confrontation between the conservatives and liberals
B、displays the affirmative attitude of the conservatives
C、shows the conservatives’ contemptuous opinion towards the regulation
D、tells us the concerning and caring nature of such regulation
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3293539.html
相关试题推荐
Brainsorbeauty?Womenarestillindilemma.ApollreleasedTuesdayfound
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanswhich(1)toindividualis
随机试题
【S1】[br]【S9】seems—seemedseems应改为seemed,与前面的时态一致。
Theroleofandtreatmentofthehousewife,whichisreallythemajorboneof
"Avoidtherush-hour"mustbethesloganoflargecitiesallovertheworld.
出版物的内在质量主要是指出版物的思想政治和科学文化内容,出版物的体例结构、文字规
玻璃洒水喷头的公称动作温度93℃,颜色标志为()。A.橙色 B.红色 C
某电话机房照明系统中一回路,如图3-2所示。该照明工程按照当地省发布的《通用安
下列句子中没有语病的一句是: A他非常懊悔自己当初不该借钱给这个吃里爬外的
化工企业火灾爆炸事故不仅能造成设备损毁建筑物破坏甚至会致人死亡,预防爆炸是非常重
单位建筑工程概算编制方法中,()适用于拟建工程初步设计与已完工程或在建工程的设计
毫秒延时爆破是采用()使各个药包按不同时间顺序起爆的爆破技术。A.毫秒延时雷管
最新回复
(
0
)