2. 职称英语
  3. E-Mail Madness: Breaking Rules and Loving It For all the

E-Mail Madness: Breaking Rules and Loving It For all the

游客2023-12-20  14
问题                      E-Mail Madness: Breaking Rules and Loving It
   For all the cultural upheavals being wrought by new technology, the spread of writing may be one of the biggest. Everybody, it seems, is writing these days.
   The catalyst is e-mail messages and Web chat. In electronic messages and conversations, millions of people who thought that after their schooling ended they would never have to worry about a semicolon again are spending time, lots of it, writing.
   “E-mail is basically a kind of grass-roots rediscovery of writing,” said Rob Wittig, the director of Tank20, which puts fiction on the Web. "People didn’t have a rule-based way of thinking about e-mail when they first got it. It was purely utilitarian. The verbal play and inventiveness of spoken conversation was able to jump the barrier into the new medium and get combined with visual things."
   The e-mail-chat culture may be ushering in the demise of the things that sustain it: grammar, syntax, spelling and, eventually, because of the visual, shorthand, hypertextual nature of the medium, possibly even some words. As with any cultural upheaval, the changes are eventually appropriated by the era’s artists.
   A typical e-mail message does away with commas and capital letters, and is riddled with misspellings, some of which are deliberate, most probably not. There is a lot of white space because the return key functions as punctuation. Acronyms and little pictures, called glyphs or emoticons, communicate thoughts and expressions. The freedom implicit in jettisoning grammatical rules could be what has enabled the e-mail-chat revolution to occur, unlocking the inner writer in everyone. Not having to abide by grammatical rule, as chat room visitors might say, makes them smile.
   But is writing e-mail and chatting really writing?
   Some writers who still believe in the importance of things like etymology and spelling and grammar say more people writing more often can only help the march of literature itself.
   “Anything that takes away the fear of writing has got to be very healthy,” said William Zinsser, who teaches writing at the New School University in New York. "What has been given back to people by e-mail is really their natural right to talk to someone else on paper without all these inhibitions that the school systems have foisted on them."
   The ease of writing on the Internet may also be fostering a legion of would-be writers. Depending on one’s point of view, this may or may not be a good thing.
   Proponents of electronic literature say that in addition to unlocking the writer within, e-mail and chat are fostering a new wave of literacy. As a result, a new language is developing, and like all Internet phenomena, it is evolving quickly.
   But Cynthia Ozick, the essayist, novelist and short-story writer, said that the speed and ease of composing on the computer doesn’t help the language change but rather, it stunts it. Writing on the computer, she added, foster prolixity; ease of use deprives the author of much-needed time to ponder. That disappoints her.
   “At the start,” Ozick said, “there was this excitement: we’re going to enter an age like the new 18th-century epistolary, glorious age. We do have an epistles age--it consists of grunts.”
   Wittig, who puts some of his writings on the Tank20 Web site, said that people should expect that writing will evolve. "Many people who are really smart make the mistake of identifying the beauty of language, love of language, history of language with their own beloved style," he said. "If there’s anything that we learn from the long view of literary history it’s that styles change."
   The ease and speed and casualness of writing found on the Internet has infected some authors who write work to be published online, including Ozick, who mostly uses pen and paper to write. In 1997, Ozick wrote a diary for the online magazine Slate. For the project, she broke with her handwriting routine and used a computer. The diary entries, now archived on the Slate site, www. slate, com, have a conversational quality not often associated with her. Ozick said she didn’t notice any difference in tone between her Slate diary and her other work, but conceded, "I was writing for Slate, and you write for your audience."
   There is a break in the clouds for those who fear the loss of the language, grammar, spelling and with them, compelling prose, even in the e-mail-chat world. It is one of the oldest reasons to write with care: love letters.
   "In the Elizabethan period, being able to write a poem or a very sophisticated letter was a basic courtship tool," Wittig said. "The success of your affairs of the heart depended on your ability to write really well. The same hold true now." He predicted that 10 years from now, the best of these amorous exchanges will be published and enjoyed as literature.
   On the Web, of course. (812) [br] We get the impression that the writer of this article ______.
选项 A、bitterly criticizes the writing style of e-mail
B、is in favor of the writing style of e-mail
C、does not express explicitly his own attitude towards the writing style of e-mail
D、is strongly against the substandard writing style of e-mail
答案 C
解析 观点态度题。本文的作者采取的是一种客观记述的写法，一一罗列出各方对电子邮件和网上聊天写作风格的态度，以及这种写作风格可能对语言产生的影响，但是自始至终作者也没有发表自己对此的看法，因此只有C是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3290135.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)