首页
登录
职称英语
In the beginning, E. Mavis Hetherington was looking for as much pathology as
In the beginning, E. Mavis Hetherington was looking for as much pathology as
游客
2023-12-17
18
管理
问题
In the beginning, E. Mavis Hetherington was looking for as much pathology as the next person.
It was the early 1970s, with the American family in free fall, and she fully expected that her just-launched study. of the impact of divorce would find dysfunction and plenty of it: parents unable to cope, maladjusted children with long-term difficulties. By almost any measure-emotional, social or ecademic-"we expected them to blow it."
Yet here’s the surprising thing about her families, with all their couplings and uncouplings and even recouplings during the years that followed: the vast majority of parents rebounded from the pain and upheaval. Resiliency overshadowed pathology. And by the time the children were young adults, considering marriage and families of their own, Hetherington discovered at least 75% coping fairly well--some very well--with life.
Divorce, it seems, is not predestined.
Now at the close of her pioneering career, Hetherington, 75, wants to get the word out. More than that, with the publication of For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered, she wants to change the public debate about divorce.
Her book offers reassurance to the millions of Americans who don’t make it till death does part them. More than 40% of marriage end in divorce, down from the high record of the 1980s hut hardly a statistic for celebration. The most decisive aspect has long centered on the harm inflicted on children-irreparable damage, some researchers contend.
Hetherington, a University of Virginia professor, believes she offers "a more hopeful look, a more realistic look" at the consequences. She says the hook, authored with New York writer John Kelly, is neither anti-marriage (though angry e-mails already are accusing her of such) nor pro-divorce. Rather, it explains the challenges people face and the diverse choices they make. It doesn’t ignore the downside. While most children adapt and adjust to their parents’ split, she says, 20% to 25% are left deeply scarred.
"I harbour no doubts about the ability of divorce to devastate," she writes. "It can and does ruin lives. But that, I also think much current writing on divorce--both popular and academic--has exaggerated its negative effects and ignored its sometimes considerable positive effects."
After three decades exploring the most important nexus of human relations, through the stability or dissolution of nearly 1,400 marriages, she wishes others weren’t so skeptical, "Why are people so afraid to say that in the long run, people end up living reasonable constructive lives?"
Hetherington officially retired three years ago. The emeritus title relieved the 80-hour weeks she’d maintained at the university since her sons were little. She continues to write scholarly article, rising at 4 a.m. to begin work in her study--in Longhand, on yellow legal pads--and still lectures internationally.
Hetherington knows that recasting the way America thinks about divorce won’t be easy or politically popular. The pendulum swung far right during the 1990’s, with lawmakers debating, and. sometimes passing, measures to encourage couples to-stay married and prevent them from divorcing too quickly. "It’s very hard to legislate family relations," Hetherington says, as dubious now as then. "If we could legislate family relations, we wouldn’t have people getting married with these unrealistic expectations about marriage."
Far better to understand the dynamics that sustain and threaten families. Far better, she writes, to accept that "divorce is a reasonable solution to an unhappy, acrimonious, destructive marital relationship." Instead of a narrow focus on the hazards, why not acknowledge that it can be an opportunity to build a better life?
"It isn’t a matter of whether the glass is half empty or half full. In the long run," she concludes, "the glass is three-quarters full of reasonably happy and competent adults and children, who have been resilient in coping with the challenges of divorce." [br] The authors of the book For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered intend to______.
选项
A、make Americans more confident about getting divorced and have a better life
B、support divorce but is not anti-marriage
C、offer some alternatives on how to avoid divorce
D、understate the suffering inflicted on children of divorced parents
答案
A
解析
第五段谈到Professor Hetherington出书的目的是想改变人们对离婚的看法,从而对离婚的后果有更乐观、更现实的看法(a more hopeful look,a more realistic look)。第八段中她还指出人们总是夸大离婚的负面影响而忽视其正面的影响。接着在第九段她提出“为什么人们这么害怕承认离异家庭的成员最后总是生活得不错呢?”由此可见,她的目的是想让人们相信离婚后仍能生活得好。因此A是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3280384.html
相关试题推荐
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghost
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghost
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghost
[originaltext]TheWorldHeritageCommittee(WHC)overlookingconservationof
[originaltext]AndPresidentBushsaystheUnitedStatesislookingintorepo
[originaltext]AndPresidentBushsaystheUnitedStatesislookingintorepo
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinal
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinal
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinal
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinal
随机试题
勘察设计合同委托方应当承担下列责任,其中错误答案为()。A.不得将设计图纸提
健康管理的伦理关系性质是()A.一种双向的、特定的、动态的关系 B.一种单向
A.未及时改用口服补液来纠正累积丢失量、全部继续丢失量和生理需要量 B.与快速
图1是真核细胞染色体上基因的表达过程示意图,有关叙述不正确的是()。 A.
根据下表,回答问题: 如果2011年下半年各项服务性消费支出的数值与201
C原题中第一个图形,五角星面的黑色角对着圆形面。直接排除ABD,选择C选项。
成语“心知肚明”的发明人可能从未思考过它的生物学含义。在事物安全性和有效性的判断
张老师因上课连续迟到,学校依据相关规章制度给予其记过处分,并停发半年绩效工资。张
鹿某为引起政府对其利益诉求的重视,以生产、生活和科研需要为由,在两年内向十几个行
(2019年真题)关于工程测量的说法,错误的是()。A.通常机电工程的测量精度
最新回复
(
0
)