首页
登录
职称英语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
游客
2023-12-14
56
管理
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliché that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3+ 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West Conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing. [br] A 2006 study found that______.
选项
A、both the Chinese and Westerners use the same part of the brain to do arithmetic
B、the Chinese use visual and spatial circuits while Westerners use language circuits
C、the Chinese conceive numbers as words while Westerners conceive numbers as symbols
D、neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal.
答案
B
解析
根据原文第五段,我们得知东西方人使用不同的大脑区域来进行算术;东方人倾向于视觉加工,而西方人倾向于语言加工;西方人把数字当作语言来加工,而东方人把数字当作视觉标志来进行加工;根据该段最后一句得知,大脑神经运作过程是因文化不同而不同的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3272618.html
相关试题推荐
JonasFrisenhadhiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedt
JonasFrisenhadhiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedt
Shoulddoctorseverlietobenefittheirpatients—tospeedrecoveryortocon
Shoulddoctorseverlietobenefittheirpatients—tospeedrecoveryortocon
Shoulddoctorseverlietobenefittheirpatients—tospeedrecoveryortocon
IftheFederationofAmericanScientistsmadealistofeducationalvideogam
IftheFederationofAmericanScientistsmadealistofeducationalvideogam
IftheFederationofAmericanScientistsmadealistofeducationalvideogam
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyh
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyh
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B6】A、forB、fromC、ofD、withD本题测试动词搭配的用法。固定搭配providesb.sth.向(人)提供(物)
防水混凝土配合比中,水泥用量不得少于()kg/m3。A.200 B.300
医学伦理学公正原则的本质是对病人A.耐心周到 B.充满爱心 C.一视同仁
关于工程变更的范围,下列说法正确的有()。A.取消合同中任何一项工作,且被
某股份有限公司的董事会由11人组成,其中董事长1人,副董事长2人。该董事会某次会
可形成不完全吞噬的吞噬细胞是A.中性粒细胞B.γδT细胞C.树突状细胞D.NK细
A.血小板有关B.中性粒细胞有关C.红细胞有关D.凝血因子有关E.血浆白蛋白有关
下列关于城市规划实施的表述,哪项是错误的()?A.编制控制性详细规划是实施城市
A.3π B.4π C.5π D.14/3π
某监理单位承担了一工业项目的施工监理工作。经过招标,建设单位选择了甲、乙施工单位
最新回复
(
0
)