首页
登录
职称英语
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as
游客
2023-12-12
19
管理
问题
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to (b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say "science" they mean (a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: the very word calls up a picture of graphs, test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, and astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician is described as a "man of science": no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology or their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly.
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained, one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. The world, in other words, would be a better place if the scientists were in control of it. But a "scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or a physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer, as such. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist", in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so.
Take one simple test — the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. Hitler may have ruined the long-term prospects of German science, but there were still plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb. Without them the German war machine could never have been built up.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method — a method that can be used on any problem that one meets — and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the sciences, in other words — more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this. For if science is simply a method or an attitude, so that anyone whose thought-processes are sufficiently rational can in some sense be described as a scientist — what then becomes of the enormous prestige now enjoyed by the chemist, the physicist, etc. and his claim to be somehow wiser than the rest of us?
A hundred years ago, Charles Kingsley described science as "making nasty smell in a laboratory". A year or two ago a young industrial chemist informed me, smugly, that he "could not see what was the use of poetry". So the pendulum swings to and fro, but it does not seem to me that one attitude is any better than the other. At the moment, science is on the upgrade, and so we hear, quite rightly, the claim that the masses should be scientifically educated: we do not hear, as we ought, the counter-claim that the scientists themselves would benefit by a little education. Just before writing this, I saw in an American magazine the statement that a number of British and American physicists refused from the start to do research on the atomic bomb, well knowing what use would be made of it. Here you have a group of sane men in the middle of a world of lunatics. And though no names were published, I think it would be a safe guess that all of them were people with some kind of general cultural background, some acquaintance with history or literature or the arts — in short, people whose interests were not, in the current sense of the word, purely scientific. [br] Why does the author dwell upon the concept of science in this article?
选项
A、He wants to get the name right for scientists who are not in the field of exact science.
B、He wants to show that scientists can be wrong.
C、He just wants to show the right concept to the confused people.
D、He wants to make the concept clear so that people can have the right education.
答案
D
解析
观点态度题。作者给出了科学的真正定义,并对此进行了充分论证,驳斥了很多人对于科学的含混理解。但作者的最终意图并不是明确科学概念,文中他一再提到教育问题,就是不希望错误的科学概念导致教育方向的偏差,故答案为[D]。[A]、[B]、[C]三项都不是作者的主要意图, 皆可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3268060.html
相关试题推荐
TheEnglishCivilWarisgenerallyregardedasthebeginningofmodern______his
Theword"winner"and"loser"havemanymeanings.Whenwerefertoaperson
IseenoconflictinwhattheBibletellsmeaboutGodandwhatsciencetel
IseenoconflictinwhattheBibletellsmeaboutGodandwhatsciencetel
IseenoconflictinwhattheBibletellsmeaboutGodandwhatsciencetel
IseenoconflictinwhattheBibletellsmeaboutGodandwhatsciencetel
IseenoconflictinwhattheBibletellsmeaboutGodandwhatsciencetel
IseenoconflictinwhattheBibletellsmeaboutGodandwhatsciencetel
ChristianshavegenerallyregardedChristmasasbothaholydayandholiday.
ChristianshavegenerallyregardedChristmasasbothaholydayandholiday.
随机试题
[A]menu[B]access[C]ineffective[D]enhanced[E]routine[F]particularly[G]co
Formostpeople,fatisaburden.Itdoesn’treallymatterwhereitappear
Theworld’spopulationcontinuestogrow.Therenowareabout4billionofus
[originaltext]W:Hi,John!M:Oh.Hi,Laura.What’reyoudoinghere?W:Uh...I
下列绩效审计方法中,属于定量分析方法的是( )。A.逻辑模型法 B.内容分析
下列哪项是按成苷键的原子分类的A.蒽醌苷B.黄酮苷C.木脂素苷D.氰苷E.香豆素
A.甲硝唑阴道用药 B.1:5000高锰酸钾坐浴 C.激光、冷冻等物理或手术
案例二: 一般资料:求助者,女性,己婚,40岁,本科学历,公司职员。 案例介
某人有100万元本金,年利率5%,以单利计算,3年后的本利和为()万元。A
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
最新回复
(
0
)