首页
登录
职称英语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normal
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normal
游客
2023-12-12
22
管理
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic. Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve— inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes. [br] The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
语义题。根据题干定位至末段第二句“Crafting legislation一one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve--inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests.”,紧接着下一句对该句做出进一步解释“Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled.”,结合首段末句对功利主义的解释“the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation”可以判断,trample upon“践踏”符合本处语境,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3267970.html
相关试题推荐
Manisoneofanumberofanimalsthatmakethings,butmanistheonlyone
Manisoneofanumberofanimalsthatmakethings,butmanistheonlyone
Manisoneofanumberofanimalsthatmakethings,butmanistheonlyone
Therelationshipbetweenwordsandthingsintheworldisestablishedbymeanso
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolⅠ.Introduction:Importanceofstude
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolⅠ.Introduction:Importanceofstude
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolⅠ.Introduction:Importanceofstude
WhatwerethethingsinBritainthatDr.Mathewfoundmoststrangewhenhefirst
WhatwerethethingsinBritainthatDr.Mathewfoundmoststrangewhenhefirst
WhatwerethethingsinBritainthatDr.Mathewfoundmoststrangewhenhefirst
随机试题
Itisimpossibleforpeopletoavoid______byadsinthemodernsociety.A、toinfl
根据《著作权法》的规定,下列哪一项不受《著作权法》的保护?()A.某学者根据
A.0 B.P/2 C.P D.
( )是投资成果转入生产或使用的标志。A.竣工验收 B.项目后评价 C.施
以下不属于股权投资基金特点的是( )。A.投资期限长、流动性较差 B.投资后
《国家电网公司变电运维管理规定》省公司运检部应组织(____)变电站生产准备工作
关于收益法中收益期确定的说法,正确的是( )。A、在正常市场和运营条件下估价对象
商业银行理财产品按照风险分类有()。A.中等风险产品 B.低风险产品
(2017年真题)有一家高科技生产企业,在公司规模扩大和业务拓展的压力下,公司高
某工程双代号网络计划如下图所示,已标明各项工作的最早开始时间(ESi—j)、最迟
最新回复
(
0
)