首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-11
31
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] In his experiments, the subjects______ Mr. Kahneman’s proof of their errors.
选项
A、can identify with
B、turn a deaf ear to
C、feel aversion to
D、are overjoyed to hear about
答案
B
解析
细节题。由题干中的proof of their errors定位至末段。第二句指出,卡内曼拿出确凿证据证明实验者的错误时,他们非常困惑地保持了沉默,紧接着,一切又回归原样。可见[B]“置若罔闻”符合文意,故为答案。[A]项意为“认同”,与原文矛盾,排除;这里只是指出实验者们保持沉默,并没有表现出厌烦,[C]“感到厌恶”无依据;[D]“狂喜的”与此处的confused silence和followed by business as usual矛盾,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262564.html
相关试题推荐
Whatisthepublicreactiontowardsthenewsthatavaccineagainstcervicalcan
Accordingtothenewsitem,thisyearIraqwouldbantheimmunitytowards[origi
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
随机试题
态度的构成因素包括()A.认知 B.情感 C.意向 D.行为 E.价值
若函数f(x)在x=x0处取得极值,则下列结论成立的是( )。
法洛四联症四种畸形不包括A.主动脉骑跨 B.右心室肥厚 C.肺动脉狭窄 D
企业的核心目标是:()A.生存 B.发展 C.获利 D.扩大市场份额
患者一身面目俱黄,黄色鲜明,腹微满,口渴,小便不利,舌苔黄腻,脉沉数。治疗应选用
教学案例: (师)上课前一分钟,先请一学生在讲台上玩电子游戏(大屏幕展示给全班
A.硫黄 B.白鲜皮 C.秦皮 D.土茯苓 E.乌梅治疗梅毒,湿热疮毒,
A.嗜碱性中幼粒细胞B.早幼粒细胞C.小淋巴细胞D.中性中幼粒细胞E.嗜酸性中幼
由于考虑风险损失,许多投资人不愿把资金投向高风险的高新技术产业,这属于( )。
(2017年真题)2015年5月1日,秦某与甲房地产开发公司(以下称甲公司)签订
最新回复
(
0
)