首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-11
20
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] In his experiments, the subjects______ Mr. Kahneman’s proof of their errors.
选项
A、can identify with
B、turn a deaf ear to
C、feel aversion to
D、are overjoyed to hear about
答案
B
解析
细节题。由题干中的proof of their errors定位至末段。第二句指出,卡内曼拿出确凿证据证明实验者的错误时,他们非常困惑地保持了沉默,紧接着,一切又回归原样。可见[B]“置若罔闻”符合文意,故为答案。[A]项意为“认同”,与原文矛盾,排除;这里只是指出实验者们保持沉默,并没有表现出厌烦,[C]“感到厌恶”无依据;[D]“狂喜的”与此处的confused silence和followed by business as usual矛盾,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262564.html
相关试题推荐
Whatisthepublicreactiontowardsthenewsthatavaccineagainstcervicalcan
Accordingtothenewsitem,thisyearIraqwouldbantheimmunitytowards[origi
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
随机试题
[originaltext]AclassicalguitaristwasthrilledtohearfromNewYorkCit
Hetriedto______hisinvolvementinthisscheme,buthefinallygaveinandco
Thesenator’sremarkthatsheisambivalentaboutrunningforasecondtermis(
某工程,建设单位将土建工程、安装工程分别发包给甲、乙两家施工单位,在合同履行过程
Text2Nowondertheyarecalled"patient
下列选项不会引起民事法律关系变更的是( )。A.主体的变更 B.内容的变更
A.Ⅰ~Ⅳ期临床试验 B.人体药代动力学研究 C.开放试验 D.人体药代动
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
甲公司走私汽车获利人民币4000万元后,欲通过乙期货交易所的账户将该笔资金换成外
施工单位违反工程建设强制性标准的,总监理工程师应及时签发( )。A.工程暂停令
最新回复
(
0
)