首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-11
42
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] According to the passage, the human brain can be described as
选项
A、irrational.
B、oblivious.
C、disorderly.
D、capricious.
答案
D
解析
细节题。由the human brain定位至第四段首句。句中flighty意为“反复无常的”,与capricious“善变的,反复无常的”含义相同,故[D]为答案。虽然句中提到less like a model of rationality,但并没有完全否认其理性的一面,排除[A];句中的easily distracted意为“容易分心的”,而oblivious意为“健忘的”,与原文不符,排除[B];另外一个提及的特点是lacking in self-awareness,即“缺少自觉意识”,并非[C]项“混乱的,凌乱的”,排除该项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262562.html
相关试题推荐
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Janet’sattitudetowardstheAmericanizedstyleasamodelforbusinessnegotiat
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
RobinsonCrusoeiswrittenby______.A、HenryFieldingB、DanielDefoeC、SamuelRi
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
随机试题
Youaretowriteinnolessthan120wordsaboutthetitle"TheProportiono
Cricket,althoughlovedbymillionsofpeople,isnotoneoftheeasiestspo
[originaltext]W:I’dappreciateyourprofessionalopinion.DoyouthinkthatI
甲公司擅自使用电视剧《华妃传》中华妃扮演者的剧照为某化妆品做广告,甲公司的行为侵
下面关于SNMP的说法中,错误的是()。A.SNMP是简单网络管理协议 B
乘务员不固定客车及线路、按车站排定的次序,在车站配属的客车上轮流工作,并根据客车
用于肝气都滞或肝胃不和所致的胁肋作痛兼见热象者,最宜用A.枳实 B.佛手 C
a、b两种单色光以相同的入射角从某种介质射向真空,光路如图所示,则以下叙述错误的
关于透皮吸收铁剂的使用,叙述不正确的是A.一定要避开伤口 B.最好每次粘贴于同
对培训效果进行结果评估的时间应为( )。A.课程开始时 B.三个月或半年以后
最新回复
(
0
)