首页
登录
职称英语
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’
游客
2023-12-08
21
管理
问题
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’s been with the Federal Communications Commission’s new media-ownership rules. We’re told that, unless the FCC’s decision is reversed, it will worsen the menacing concentration of media power and that this will--to exaggerate only slightly--imperil free speech, the diversity of opinion and perhaps democracy itself. All this is more than overwrought; it completely misrepresents reality.
In the past 30 years, media power has splintered dramatically; people have more choices than ever. Travel back to 1970. There were only three major TV networks (ABC, CBS, NBC); now, there’s a fourth (Fox). Then, there was virtually no cable TV; now, 68 percent of households have it. Then, FM radio was a backwater; now there are 5,892 FM stations, up from 2,196 in 1970. Then, there was only one national newspaper (The Wall Street Journal); now, there are two more (USA Today and The New York Times ).
The idea that "big media" has dangerously increased its control over our choices is absurd. Yet much of the public, including journalists and politicians, believe religiously in this myth. They confuse size with power. It’s true that some gigantic media companies are getting even bigger at the expense of other media companies. But it’s not true that their power is increasing at the public’s expense.
Popular hostility toward big media stems partly from the growing competition, which creates winners and losers and losers complain. Liberals don’t like the conservative talk shows, but younger viewers do. A June poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found that viewers from the ages of 18 to 29 approved of "hosts with strong opinions" by a 58 percent to 32 percent margin. Social conservatives despise what one recently called "the raw sewage, ultra violence, graphic sex and raunchy language" of TV. But many viewers love it. Journalists detest the cost and profit pressures that result from stiff com petition with other news and entertainment outlets.
It’s the tyranny of the market: a triumph of popular tastes. Big media companies try to anticipate, shape and profit from these tastes. But media diversity frustrates any one company from imposing its views and values on an unwilling audience. People just click to another channel or cancel their subscription. The paradox is this: the explosion of choices means that almost everyone may be offended by something. A lot of this free-floating hostility has attached itself to the FCC ownership rules.
The backlash is easily exaggerated. In the Pew poll, 51 percent of respondents knew "nothing" of the rules; an additional 36 percent knew only "a little". The rules would permit any company to own television stations in areas with 45 percent of U. S. households, up from 35 percent now. The networks could buy more of their affiliate stations a step that, critics say, would jeopardize "local’ control and content.
At best, that’s questionable. Network programs already fill most of affiliates’ hours. To keep local audiences, any owner must satisfy local demands, especially for news and weather programming. But the symbolic backlash against the FCC and big media does pose one hidden danger. For some U.S. house holds, over-the-air broadcasting is the only TV available, and its long-term survival is hardly ensured. Both cable and the Internet are eroding its audience. In 2002 cable programming had more primetime viewers than broadcast programming for 1he first time (48 percent vs. 46 percent). Streaming video, now primitive, will improve; sooner or later certainly in the next 10 or 15 years--many Web sites will be TV channels. If over-the-air broadcasting declines or disappears, the big losers will be the poor.
Broadcast TV will survive and flourish only if the networks remain profitable enough to bid for and provide competitive entertainment, sports and news programming. The industry’s structure must give them a long-term stake in over-the-air broadcasting. Owning more TV stations is one possibility. If Congress prevents that, it may perversely hurt the very diversity and the people that it’s trying to protect. [br] All of the following are people’s worries EXCEPT that ______.
选项
A、the bigger media companies become, the more powerful they are.
B、the bigger media companies become, the fewer our choices are.
C、the mass will become victims of the expansion of media companies.
D、other media companies will pay for the expansion of some companies.
答案
D
解析
细节题。由选项中的media companies定位至第三段。首句指出:那种认为大媒体公司会加强控制我们选择的想法是愚蠢的。第三句指出原因;They confuse size with power.达意味着人们认为公司规模增大,就会变得更加强大,[A]符合文意。结合首句可以得出[B]符合文意。末句的“But it’s not true that their power is increasing at the public’s expense”表明[C]符合文意。倒数第二句与[D]意思一致,但显然这不是人们反对FCC决定的理由,即不是人们的担心,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3256600.html
相关试题推荐
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’
ThefollowingarethefoundingfathersoftheAmericanRepublicexcept______.A、
[originaltext]A:So,you’reanarchitect?B:Yes.A:Doyouworkforapublico
[originaltext]A:So,you’reanarchitect?B:Yes.A:Doyouworkforapublico
[originaltext]A:So,you’reanarchitect?B:Yes.A:Doyouworkforapublico
Sinceindependence,theIrishRepublichasadheredto______.A、apolicyofprotec
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.IntroductionA.Publicsp
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.IntroductionA.Publicsp
随机试题
下列关于冷却塔热交换推动力定义的叙述中,正确的是哪项?()A.进出冷却塔空气
某电子商务公司要从A地向B地的用户发送一批价值90000元的货物。从A地到
焊缝超声波检测最常采用的是()A.纵波法 B.兰姆波法 C.横波法
既涩肠止泻,又温中行气的药是A:砂仁B:小茴香C:草豆蔻D:罂粟壳E:肉
经过详细的研究,没有发现产生误差的原因或在某些方面不够明确的方法为A.决定性方法
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
通货和活期存款都有一定的或较高的收益率。( )
()是指评价员工绩效的指标及标准,为了实现组织目标,对个人或集体的绩效应当达到
关于回转交易,下列说法错误的是()。A:目前,我国证券交易所的所有交易品种都不可
心理测验具有()多选A.外显性 B.间接性 C.相对性 D.客观性
最新回复
(
0
)