首页
登录
职称英语
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’
游客
2023-12-08
21
管理
问题
Our public debates often fly off into the wild blue yonder of fantasy. So it’s been with the Federal Communications Commission’s new media-ownership rules. We’re told that, unless the FCC’s decision is reversed, it will worsen the menacing concentration of media power and that this will--to exaggerate only slightly--imperil free speech, the diversity of opinion and perhaps democracy itself. All this is more than overwrought; it completely misrepresents reality.
In the past 30 years, media power has splintered dramatically; people have more choices than ever. Travel back to 1970. There were only three major TV networks (ABC, CBS, NBC); now, there’s a fourth (Fox). Then, there was virtually no cable TV; now, 68 percent of households have it. Then, FM radio was a backwater; now there are 5,892 FM stations, up from 2,196 in 1970. Then, there was only one national newspaper (The Wall Street Journal); now, there are two more (USA Today and The New York Times ).
The idea that "big media" has dangerously increased its control over our choices is absurd. Yet much of the public, including journalists and politicians, believe religiously in this myth. They confuse size with power. It’s true that some gigantic media companies are getting even bigger at the expense of other media companies. But it’s not true that their power is increasing at the public’s expense.
Popular hostility toward big media stems partly from the growing competition, which creates winners and losers and losers complain. Liberals don’t like the conservative talk shows, but younger viewers do. A June poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found that viewers from the ages of 18 to 29 approved of "hosts with strong opinions" by a 58 percent to 32 percent margin. Social conservatives despise what one recently called "the raw sewage, ultra violence, graphic sex and raunchy language" of TV. But many viewers love it. Journalists detest the cost and profit pressures that result from stiff com petition with other news and entertainment outlets.
It’s the tyranny of the market: a triumph of popular tastes. Big media companies try to anticipate, shape and profit from these tastes. But media diversity frustrates any one company from imposing its views and values on an unwilling audience. People just click to another channel or cancel their subscription. The paradox is this: the explosion of choices means that almost everyone may be offended by something. A lot of this free-floating hostility has attached itself to the FCC ownership rules.
The backlash is easily exaggerated. In the Pew poll, 51 percent of respondents knew "nothing" of the rules; an additional 36 percent knew only "a little". The rules would permit any company to own television stations in areas with 45 percent of U. S. households, up from 35 percent now. The networks could buy more of their affiliate stations a step that, critics say, would jeopardize "local’ control and content.
At best, that’s questionable. Network programs already fill most of affiliates’ hours. To keep local audiences, any owner must satisfy local demands, especially for news and weather programming. But the symbolic backlash against the FCC and big media does pose one hidden danger. For some U.S. house holds, over-the-air broadcasting is the only TV available, and its long-term survival is hardly ensured. Both cable and the Internet are eroding its audience. In 2002 cable programming had more primetime viewers than broadcast programming for 1he first time (48 percent vs. 46 percent). Streaming video, now primitive, will improve; sooner or later certainly in the next 10 or 15 years--many Web sites will be TV channels. If over-the-air broadcasting declines or disappears, the big losers will be the poor.
Broadcast TV will survive and flourish only if the networks remain profitable enough to bid for and provide competitive entertainment, sports and news programming. The industry’s structure must give them a long-term stake in over-the-air broadcasting. Owning more TV stations is one possibility. If Congress prevents that, it may perversely hurt the very diversity and the people that it’s trying to protect. [br] It can be inferred from the last paragraph that the author ______.
选项
A、advocates the Congress’s rejection of ownership rules.
B、calls for the Congress’s approval of FCC’s decision.
C、expresses his concern over the future of media companies.
D、speaks up for big media companies as well as poor people.
答案
B
解析
推断题,直接定位至末段。第三句捉到了让over-the-air broadcasting生存下去的办法:Owning more TV stations is one possibility.从前面内容可知,“拥有更多的电视台”是FCC决议的内容,也是反对者们表示反对的原因。从末句“If Congress prevents that,it may perversely hurt the very diversity and the people that it’s trying to protect”可知,作者认为Congress应该批准该项决议,以保护节目多样化及观众中的穷人。可推知[B]符合文意,故为答案。[A]与文意相反,排除。末段未提到media companies,排除[C]和[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3256603.html
相关试题推荐
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’
[originaltext]A:So,you’reanarchitect?B:Yes.A:Doyouworkforapublico
[originaltext]A:So,you’reanarchitect?B:Yes.A:Doyouworkforapublico
[originaltext]A:So,you’reanarchitect?B:Yes.A:Doyouworkforapublico
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.IntroductionA.Publicsp
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.IntroductionA.Publicsp
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.IntroductionA.Publicsp
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearI.IntroductionA.Publicsp
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Thecityisgoingtoteardownthoseoldonefetoryhousesand
OnenightinApril1912,ahugenew【B1】______liner,theTitanic,was【B2】____
ToHelptheKids,ParentsGoBacktoSchoolA)Forafewyearsno
因发生不可抗力事件导致工期延误,下列说法正确的有()。A.发包人要求赶工的,承包
下列关于生产安全事故等级的表述中,正确的有( )。A.某事故造成了150人重伤,
近代最早一部系统论述教育问题的专著是()A.《教育漫活》 B.《大教学论》
女性,33岁,下腹痛伴肛门坠胀感5日,发热1日,查体阴道分泌物增多,后穹隆饱满、
桥面铺装即行车道铺装,不适用的铺装材料有()。A:防水混凝土 B:沥青混凝土
芯样试件截面上部芯样位置距桩顶设计标高()A.不宜小于0.5m B.不宜大于
采用美国AIA合同文本时,工程设计阶段CM承包商介入并为设计者提供建议。建议的内
最新回复
(
0
)