首页
登录
职称英语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
游客
2023-12-07
28
管理
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through the application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate. Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern", a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate; the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master; a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy- and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions; King, not so much. [br] Frans de Waal believes that morality comes from
选项
A、our primate ancestors.
B、social revolutions.
C、the ability of reasoning.
D、cooperative groups.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由题干中的人名和morality comes from定位到第二段第一句“But in The Bonobo and theAtheist,primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better:moralitycomes from our evolutionary past as a social primate.”,可见Frans de Waal认为,作为灵长类动物,道德是由我们自身进化而来的,也就是说道德来自我们灵长类动物的祖先,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3251968.html
相关试题推荐
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.W
SomeTheoriesofHistoryI.Theproblemsofunderstandi
SomeTheoriesofHistoryI.Theproblemsofunderstandi
SomeTheoriesofHistoryI.Theproblemsofunderstandi
SomeTheoriesofHistoryI.Theproblemsofunderstandi
SomeTheoriesofHistoryI.Theproblemsofunderstandi
随机试题
Beforeyoucangointoseethedoctor,pleasefillouttheseforms.Oneisfory
非编码型手动火灾报警按钮可以直接接入区域型火灾报警控制器总线回路。
仿真内窥镜成像与纤维内窥镜比较,优点是A.能进行病变组织活检 B.能检出腔内扁
(2017年真题)对于信托(契约)型股权投资基金的而言,基金份额的转让涉及(
易发生房室传导阻滞的是( )。A.下壁心肌梗死 B.正后壁心肌梗死 C.前
当采样频率为4000Hz时,电子式电流互感器的额定延时不大于()。(A)
材料在自然状态下单位体积所具有的质量称为( )。A.孔隙率 B.空隙率 C
任务中心模式把()视为社会工作者与服务对象之间进行交流的工具。A.沟通 B.鼓
国务院期货监督管理机构对期货市场实施监督管理,依法履行的职责有()。A.制定期
下列属于关系社会公共利益、公众安全的项目中,属于通信基础设施项目的有()。
最新回复
(
0
)