首页
登录
职称英语
Some Theories of History I. The problems of understandi
Some Theories of History I. The problems of understandi
游客
2023-12-08
25
管理
问题
Some Theories of History
I. The problems of understanding history
History with written records: the records may be
【B1】______ and inaccurate. 【B1】______
History before writing: we can only make a partial reconstruction.
II. Some theories have been proposed to give coherence to human history
Theory 1
Man continually 【B2】______ in terms of his potentials and 【B2】______
his abilities to actualize these potentials.
l Modern man is superior to his ancestors
【B3】______, physically and morally. 【B3】______
A branch of the theory: man rose to a 【B4】______ before. 【B4】______
Theory 2
Man’s history is a 【B5】______ of stages of development, 【B5】______
whose pattern is the rise and fall of civilization.
Whether modern man is superior to his ancestors depends on
what 【B6】______ of civilization he is in. 【B6】______
Theory 3
In this theory, the first two theories 【B7】______ with each other. 【B7】______
It is known as the 【B8】______ of history. 【B8】______
Theory 4
This theory views human history from the 【B9】______ 【B9】______
of socioeconomic groups.
Human history can be interpreted as the 【B10】______ of class struggle. 【B10】______ [br] 【B3】
Some Theories of History
Good morning, everyone. In today’s lecture, we are going to talk about some theories of history.
How much of man’s history do we know? We really know very little. [1]Written records exist for only a fraction of what we suppose to have been man’s time as a unique species. Furthermore, the accuracy of these records is often suspected, and the scope and selection of significant detail in them often needs improvement.
It is worse when we try to reconstruct man’s history before the development of writing, and this is unfortunate because the history of the early development of human society is lost to us. The most that we can do is to use traces, deduction, speculation and the knowledge we have of the habits of those animals which have some elementary social order to help us make a partial reconstruction. This is hardly a satisfactory substitute for precise information.
With our knowledge of human history, which is only fragmentary at best, it is therefore nearly impossible to reconstruct the beginning, and to deduce the end, of the story of man. Thus, there have developed many schools of thought on the subject, each of which attempts to give coherence to the human past by fitting it into the framework of a theory of history.
[2]The first theory I want to introduce is assumed that man continually progress. He has evolved from a lower to a higher form of being, and he continues to evolve. This evolution takes place both in terms of his potentials and his abilities to actualize these potentials.
[3]If one holds this theory, one feels that modern man must be more intelligent and civilized today than his ancestors, as well as physically and morally superior to them. One further assumes that this progress will continue into an ever more glorious future. Here deduction often ends and dreams of utopia begin, for it seems that most of us find it hard to think of the human race developing into a race of angels. All in all, as a theory of history, the above view has had many eminent supporters.
It might be well to mention here a variation on this theory that used to be popular, [4]namely the idea that man rose from a low condition to a Golden Age at some time in the remote past, and that things have gone straight downhill ever since. Many eminent men have found a sort of gloomy comfort in this idea, but science has now opened up possibilities for the future which makes this theory less defendable. Perhaps for this reason the theory has little modern support.
A second theory of history is held by those men who see man’s history as something quite different from a simple progression from a lower to a higher state. [5]They see it as a cycle of stages of development which are predictable in their broad outlines and main features. As surely as a civilization rises and comes into being, so also must it decline and fall. The chief pattern one sees in history is the rise and fall of civilization.
To holders of this theory, modern man is not looked upon as the most superior social being yet produced. He is simply the typical product of the current stage in the cycle of our civilization. In fact he may actually be inferior to members of past civilizations. [6]It all depends upon what stage of civilization we happen to be living in. Indeed, it has been said that the average modern literate city dweller is comparatively more ignorant of his era’s fund of knowledge than other literate city dwellers of the past. While the staggering fund of knowledge in our technologically advanced world is undoubtedly greater than that of any past civilization, it is probably true that the average modern man, relying on such repetitive forms of entertainment as television and working in a narrowly specialized job, knows a great deal less sheer information about his world than did earlier people.
[7]In a third theory of history, the two above theories are to some degree reconciled.
[8]According to this theory, which is often termed the spiral view of history, human societies do repeat a cycle of stages, but overall progress observable in the long historical perspective.
Civilizations do rise and fall, as the advocates of the second theory maintain, but the new civilization which replaces the first, usually by conquest, contains superior qualities which enable it to rise to a higher stage of development until it, too, declines and is replaced by yet a third civilization.
The above theories interpret history in term as if the overall progress of mankind in general without respect to differentiations within the social order. [9]It is also possible to view human history in terms of the interaction of socioeconomic groups. [10]Human history, according to this theory, is most clearly interpreted as the disappearance of class struggle. Most people who hold this theory assume an eventual resolution of the struggle through the disappearance of class differences, although it would be just as correct to assume that the struggle could continue unresolved. Those who assume that the struggle can eventually be resolved hold that history has a goal and that progress can be measured in terms of how quickly mankind is reaching that goal.
OK. This brings us to the end of today’s lecture. I hope now you can have a better understanding of what history is. Thank you for your attention.
选项
答案
mentally
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3254672.html
相关试题推荐
Whydidtheteamof10Americanshadagoalofmakinghistory?[br][originalte
Whydidtheteamof10Americanshadagoalofmakinghistory?[br][originalte
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershave
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershave
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershave
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershave
SomeProblemsFacingLearnersofEnglishAlthoughmanyEnglishlearnershave
TheproblemsfacinglearnersofEnglishcanbedividedintothreebroadcateg
TheproblemsfacinglearnersofEnglishcanbedividedintothreebroadcateg
TheproblemsfacinglearnersofEnglishcanbedividedintothreebroadcateg
随机试题
[originaltext]M:I’dliketotakeDr.Hopper’ssectionofPhysics100,butmya
美育就是艺术教育。()
患者家属加入医患关系中带来的负面效应是A.出现了从属关系 B.有时会损害患者正
颈静脉怒张不会出现在A.左心功能不全 B.右心功能不全 C.缩窄性心包炎
2014年4月l0日,中国证监会正式批复上海证券交易所和香港联合交易所开展沪港股
下列有关外商投资建设工程监理企业资质的表述错误的是( )。 A、申请外商投资
下列对于苯乙双胍的描述,哪一项是错误的A.口服有效 B.对成年型及幼年型糖尿病
按劳动效率定员是根据企业在计划期内某一类岗位的生产工作任务总量,本类岗位所实行工
多数药物在一定的剂量范围内,对不同的组织和器官所引起的药理效应和强度不同,如阿托
下列情形中,交通事故责任强制保险不需要承担保险赔偿责任的是()。A.驾驶员
最新回复
(
0
)