首页
登录
职称英语
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of
游客
2023-12-05
13
管理
问题
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s Essays. My friend Margaret Rea and I spent hours wandering around Boston discussing the meaning and implications of the essays. Michel de Montaigne lived in the 16th century near Bordeaux, France. He did his writing in the southwest tower of his chateau, where he surrounded himself with a library of more than 1,000 books, a remarkable collection for that time. Montaigne posed the question, "What do I know?" By extension, he asks us all: Why do you believe what you think you know? My latest attempt to answer Montaigne can be found in Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, originally published in January 2009 and soon to be out in paperback from the Oxford University Press.
Scientists tend to be glib about answering Montaigne’s question. After all, the success of technology testifies to the truth of our work. But the situation is more complicated.
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interests influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes communal scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, a dialectic of interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes infuse this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not research. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason," she wrote in a book with that title. In the case of science, it is the commons of the mind where we find the answer to Montaigne’s question: Why do you believe what you think you know? [br] Paragraph 5 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible after it
选项
A、has attracted the attention of the general public.
B、has been examined by the scientific community.
C、has received recognition from editors and reviewers.
D、has been frequently quoted by peer scientists.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。题干中的a discovery claim becomes credible对应第五段尾句中的an individua’sdiscovery claim into the community’s credible discovery,可见前面内容是在讲述科学界中发现申明转变成可信的发现需要经历的过程,综合概括这一过程的特征是:需要接受科学界的验证,所以答案选[B]。[A]在文中未提及:[C]和[D]均为discovery claim变成了credible discovery中涉及的一个部分,表述片面。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3247778.html
相关试题推荐
______isafamousworkwrittenbyJohnBunyan.A、AModestProposalB、TheSchoolf
Amongthecollegestudentsnowadays,thereisatendencytoattachtoomuch
ThelargestuniversityinCanadais______A、UniversityofToronto.B、McGillUniv
______isaprincipalrepresentativeofTheLondonSchool.A、SaussureB、HallidayC
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
______isafamousworkwrittenbyJohnBunyan.A、AModestProposalB、TheSchoolf
Inrecentyears,manycollegestudentshavemovedoutofdormitory.Theythi
Inrecentyears.Universitymerger,ahottopicbothonandoffcampus,has
Schoolsshouldaskstudentstohelpevaluatetheirteachers.Doyouagreeor
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Todaywehavethefamouschildren’sbookswriter,GrantR.Phi
PeoplepreferIPphonecallstoordinaryonesbecausetheformeris______.[br]
[originaltext]Iffirstimpressionsareindeedlastimpressions,Dublinhas
现有一个5000名员工的企业,公司的主要业务是IT咨询。人群的平均年龄为30岁,
下列有关针刺深度的叙述,错误的是A.年老体弱者宜浅刺 B.形瘦者宜浅刺 C.
下列用于治疗肝风内动,惊痫抽搐,头痛目赤及斑疹透发不畅的中药是A.钩藤 B.
1.()是公司的奋斗方向,是国家电网人的远大理想,是公司一切工作
在火灾自动报警控制系统中,承担将火灾发生所产生的烟、热、光转变为电信号,输入火灾
随着95后群体逐渐成为文化娱乐消费的主流人群,他们的消费观念和消费行为,将__
A.下颌缺失 B.上颌缺失 C.上颌缺失 D.下颌缺失 E.下颌缺失属于
最新回复
(
0
)