首页
登录
职称英语
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two
游客
2023-12-06
21
管理
问题
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two undergrads are playing a Monopoly game that one of them has no chance of winning. A team of psychologists has rigged it so that skill, brains, savvy, and luck—those ingredients that ineffably combine to create success in games as in life—have been made immaterial. Here, the only thing that matters is money.
One of the players, a brown-haired guy in a striped T-shirt, has been made "rich." He got $2,000 from the Monopoly bank at the start of the game and receives $200 each time he passes Go. The second player, a chubby young man in glasses, is comparatively impoverished. He was given $1,000 at the start and collects $100 for passing Go. T-Shirt can roll two dice, but Glasses can only roll one, limiting how fast he can advance. The students play for fifteen minutes under the watchful eye of two video cameras, while down the hall in another windowless room, the researchers huddle around a computer screen, later recording in a giant spreadsheet the subjects’ every facial twitch and hand gesture.
T-Shirt isn’t just winning: he’s crushing Glasses. Initially, he reacted to the inequality between him and his opponent with a series of smirks, an acknowledgment, perhaps, of the inherent awkwardness of the situation. "Hey," his expression seemed to say, "this is weird and unfair, but whatever." Soon, though, as he whizzes around the board, purchasing properties and collecting rent, whatever discomfort he feels seems to dissipate. Hes a skinny kid, but he balloons in size, spreading his limbs toward the jar ends of the table. He smacks his playing piece(in the experiment, the wealthy player gets the Rolls-Royce)as he makes the circuit—smack, smack, smack ending his turns with a board-shuddering bang! Four minutes in, he picks up Glasses’s piece, the little elf shoe, and moves it for him. As the game nears its finish, T-Shirt moves his Rolls faster. The taunting is over now: He’s all efficiency. He refuses to meet Glasses’s gaze. His expression is stone cold as he takes the loser’s cash.
For a long time, primatologists have known that chimpanzees will act out social dominance with a special ferociousness, slapping hands, stamping feet, or "charging back and forth and dragging huge branches," as Jane Goodall once wrote. And sociologists and anthropologists have explored the effects of hierarchy in tribes and groups. But psychology has only recently begun seriously investigating how having money, that major marker of status in the modern world, affects psychosocial behavior in the species Homo sapiens. By making real people temporarily very affluent, without regard to their actual economic circumstances and within the controlled environment of a psych lab, the Berkeley researchers aim to demonstrate the potency of that one variable. "Putting someone in a role where they’re more privileged and have more power in a game makes them behave like people who actually do have more power, more money, and more status," says Paul Piff, the psychologist who designed the experiment. The Monopoly results, based on a year of watching inequitable games between pairs like Glasses and T-Shirt, have not yet been released. But Piff believes that they will support and amplify his previous provocative research.
Earlier this year, Piff, who is 30, published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that made him semi-famous. Titled "Higher Social Class Predicts Increased Unethical Behavior," it showed through quizzes, online games, questionnaires, in-lab manipulations, and field studies that living high on the socioeconomic ladder can, colloquially speaking, dehumanize people. It can make them less ethical, more selfish, more insular, and less compassionate than other people. It can make them more likely, as Piff demonstrated in one of his experiments, to take candy from a bowl of sweets designated for children. "While having money doesn’t necessarily make anybody anything," Piff says, "the rich are way more likely to prioritize their own self-interests above the interests of other people. It makes them more likely to exhibit characteristics that we would stereotypically associate with, say, assholes. "
These findings, in combination with a researcher eager to promote them, reverberated online. On message boards, detractors accused Piff of using his lab to promote a leftist agenda: that his home base was Berkeley only fueled those suspicions. Piff s e-mail box filled with messages calling him a "liberal idiot" and his work "junk science." "I would wager," says Wharton business-school psychologist Philip Tetlock, "that a congressional committee chair who favors redistribution of wealth would be far more likely to call these experts in as witnesses than would a committee chair who opposes redistribution."
It is easy to see Piff’s research as ideologically motivated. The point is to "shed light on some of the consequences of social class," he says. But whatever his goal is, the "results are apolitical," he says, and the data point in a clear direction. "Would I be less excited if we found that higher-status people were more generous?" he asks. "I’d probably be less excited, but that’s not what we found." [br] According to the article, which of the following is true about Berkeley researchers?
选项
A、They publicized the results of the Monopoly game and received much criticism.
B、They found people who participated the game behaved less ethical.
C、They were excited to find people in higher socioeconomic hierarchy less generous.
D、Their purpose of the research is to clarify the hierarchy in social classes.
答案
C
解析
推断题。文章倒数第二句“Would I be less excited if we found that higher—status people were moregenerous?”可知,这里研究者反问“如果我们的研究发现地位高的人更大方,我就不会那么兴奋吗?”,后面紧接着回答“也许会不那么兴奋,但毕竟我们的研究发现不是这样的。”由此可以推断研究者对他们的研究发现实际上是很兴奋的。故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3248226.html
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUEaboutMissGreen’suniversitydays?[b
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUEaboutMissGreen’suniversitydays?[b
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUEaboutMissGreen’suniversitydays?[o
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcoll
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcoll
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcoll
AProfessorfromBeijingNormalUniversitywroteinhismicro-blog:"Atthe
TheUniversityasBusinessAnumberofcollegesandunivers
TheearliestinstitutionofhigherlearningsetupinAmericawasA、CaliforniaUn
SomestudentsatXUniversitygetprofessionalstocleantheirdorms,whichhas
随机试题
TheInternetTheInternetisalreadythegr
Whyarescientistssurprisedbythefindingsintheirnoisestudy?[br]Whichof
对于那些可能对经济决策产生重大影响的事项,应单独反映,重点说明,体现了会计信息质
调节混凝土凝结时间和硬化功能的外加剂有()。A.减水剂 B.缓凝剂 C.早强
非O1群的霍乱弧菌又称为()A.不典型O1群霍乱弧菌B.O139群霍乱弧菌C.
强调成熟机制对人的发展起决定作用的是()。 A.弗洛伊德B.格塞尔C.皮
(2019年真题)在全国范围内的市场上开展业务的银行可采用()营销组织。A.职
为了能够依据合同,公平合理地处理建设单位与施工单位之间的争议,工程监理单位必须(
关于卷材防水的说法,正确的是( )。A.冷粘法铺贴卷材时,接缝口密封材料封严宽
根据《水法》规定,堤防工程护堤地属于()A.工程效益范围 B.工程管理范
最新回复
(
0
)