首页
登录
职称英语
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of
游客
2023-11-27
20
管理
问题
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2)The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted", in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the US—meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Or for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"—and the Turks with 6.5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French(or Turkish)every year.
(3)Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media.
(4)This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether "generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools, we have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5)So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man. Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6)But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that "generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. For example, every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7)But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. US evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear mat trust is linked to "social capital" —networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common places.
(8)Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. Firstly, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better. [br] The following statements about Scandinavians or Britons are true EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、Scandinavians are generally frank and open
B、Britons are very fond of satirical art
C、Scandinavians pretend to be shrewd
D、Britons might underestimate the hazard
答案
C
解析
第5段末句提到,我们(英国人)更喜欢撅着嘴摇着头,假装精明机智。但文中并未如此描述斯堪的纳维亚人,因此选C。根据第2段末句和第5段第2句可知,斯堪的纳维亚人通常都是坦率开明的,故排除A;由第4段第3句可知,B正确,而D是对该段第6句前一分句的同义改写。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3224073.html
相关试题推荐
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;
QuestionnaireDesignI.Clarifyyourstudygoal—Writedownyourstudygoalbef
QuestionnaireDesignI.Clarifyyourstudygoal—Writedownyourstudygoalbef
QuestionnaireDesignI.Clarifyyourstudygoal—Writedownyourstudygoalbef
QuestionnaireDesignI.Clarifyyourstudygoal—Writedownyourstudygoalbef
QuestionnaireDesignI.Clarifyyourstudygoal—Writedownyourstudygoalbef
QuestionnaireDesignI.Clarifyyourstudygoal—Writedownyourstudygoalbef
随机试题
Theshortageofenergyisgettingworse.It______animmediatesolution.A、callso
如在对开四色印刷时每色加放60方,则加放的纸张总量可折合为( )等。A.120
下列关于著作权保护期限的说法中,正确的有( )。A.法人(或其他组织)的作品,
下列关于气体灭火系统设计的叙述中,哪项错误?()A.气体灭火系统适用于扑救可
对话式口头语言的特点是()。A.目的性强 B.依赖性强 C.表达充分 D.
2019年1—12月份,全国房地产开发投资132194亿元,比上年增长9.9%,
A.静脉注射液 B.多剂量滴眼液 C.颗粒剂 D.片剂 E.散剂应加入抑
红霉素静滴时为防止出现血栓性静脉炎,药物浓度不宜超过A.3mg/ml B.0
根据管理《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》 第三方互联网药品交易平台上的丁药品电
现场条件不允许进行液压和气压试验时,可采用其它方法代替压力试验,说法正确的是(
最新回复
(
0
)