首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext]I: Good morning, listeners. Today, we are very happy to have Doct
[originaltext]I: Good morning, listeners. Today, we are very happy to have Doct
游客
2023-11-24
8
管理
问题
I: Good morning, listeners. Today, we are very happy to have Doctor Michael Williams to discuss evolution of language. Well, Michael.
M: Thank you. Very pleased to meet you all here.
I: Michael, there have been many theories about why languages change. Can you give us some examples, please?
M: Of course. The first established theory of language change is one of decay and decadence proposed in the 18th century view. Their reasoning is that the old Indo-European languages like Sanskrit, Greek and Latin all have complex declension and conjugation schemes. Overtime the number of cases dropped, and the modern Indo-European languages have far fewer cases for declension and conjugation. It is said that people get increasingly careless about their speech, so they are "decadent" and have allowed the once complex language to decay into such a "simple" language.
I: Sounds interesting.
M: But this "decadence" argument has one major flaw. Even though the number of declensions and conjugations has dwindled, other parts of speech such as particles and auxiliary verbs have evolved to take their place. Anything that can be expressed in the ancient tongue can still be expressed today. Ultimately, this theory is highly subjective, as it relies on personal opinions, not scientific facts, of what is "highly evolved" and what is "decadent". So, strictly speaking, this cannot be called scientific explanation.
I: Right. Is there any other theory?
M: The next theory, proposed by the Neogrammarians, is one of natural process. They stated that changes are automatic and mechanical, and therefore cannot be observed or controlled by the speakers of the language. They found that what to a human ear a single "sound" is actually a collection of very similar sounds. They call it "low-level deviation" from an "idealized form". They argue that language change is simply a slow shift of the "idealized form" by small deviations.
I: Are there any problems concerned with this theory, too?
M: Of course. The obvious problem here is that without some kind of reinforcement, the deviation might go back and forth and cancel out any change. Then the Neogrammarians patched this theory by adding reasons for reinforcing the deviation such as simplification of sounds, or children imperfectly learning the speech of their parents.
I: Simplification of sounds? Can you explain it a little further?
M: Sure. The simplification of sounds basically states that certain sounds are easier to pronounce than others, so the natural tendency of the speakers is to modify the hard-to-say sounds to easier ones. An example would be the English word "nuclear", which many people pronounce as "nucular".
I: But who knows which one is more difficult to pronounce, "nuclear" or "nucular"?
M: Exactly. Different people may give different answers. Simplification no doubt exists, but using it as a reason of language change is too subjective to be scientific. There is another problem with children incorrectly learning the language of their parents. Let’s take an extreme case in the form of immigrants. What is observed is that children of immigrants almost always learn the language of their friends at school regardless of the parents’ dialect or original language. Children of British immigrants in the United States, for example, nearly always speak with one of the many regional American accents. So in this case, the parents’ linguistic contribution becomes less important than the social group the child is in.
I: I agree. Any other theories?
1. Which one is NOT old Indo-European language?
2. What is the main problem with the theory of decay and decadence?
3. Which statement is WRONG according to decay and decadence theory of language?
4. Which can be the best example of simplification of sounds?
5. According to Michael, why do children of immigrants have problems in learning their mother tongue?
选项
A、Because they imperfectly learn the speech of their parents.
B、Because they prefer to learn the language of their friends at school.
C、Because they are confused with different languages.
D、Because there are no teachers who teach them mother tongue.
答案
B
解析
推理题。关于移民子女学不好母语的原因,受访者提到:What is observed is that children of immigrants almost always learn the language of their friends at school regardless of the parents’ dialect or original language.Children of British immigrants in the United States,for example,nearly always speak with one of the many regional American accents.So in this case,the parents ’linguistic contribution becomes less important than the social group the child is in.表明移民子女更倾向于学习同学说的当地语言,对母语不感兴趣,因此答案是选项B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3216078.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Sure.Peopleoftenhavedifferentwaysoflearningandapproac
[originaltext]M:Sure.Peopleoftenhavedifferentwaysoflearningandapproac
[originaltext]M:Sure.Peopleoftenhavedifferentwaysoflearningandapproac
[originaltext]W:Goodeveningandwelcometotonight’sprogram.OurguestisDr
[originaltext]W:Goodeveningandwelcometotonight’sprogram.OurguestisDr
[originaltext]W:Goodeveningandwelcometotonight’sprogram.OurguestisDr
[originaltext]M:Alright,sotalktomeaboutdifferentagegroupsandhowmuch
[originaltext]M:Alright,sotalktomeaboutdifferentagegroupsandhowmuch
[originaltext]M:Alright,sotalktomeaboutdifferentagegroupsandhowmuch
[originaltext]M:RuthPetersisachildpsychologist,hey,Ruth,goodmorning.
随机试题
ABriefHistoryofOnlineShoppingA)WhenAma
Thereekofthetwintowers’rubblestillpermeatedLowerManhattanwhenYaro
Intheolddays,childrenwerefamiliarwithbirthanddeathaspartoflife
混凝土配料时,砂石骨料的允许偏差为()。A.±1% B.±2% C.+3
下列结论中正确的是( )。
酶法分析优于传统的化学法不包括A.准确性B.精密度C.灵敏度D.线性范围E.抗干
某铁路局积极采取措施,降低运输支出。该局2003年单位货运支出为5分/吨公里,与
下列哪项不属于详细规划阶段的燃气工程规划工作内容?()A.计算燃气管网管径
论述建构主义学习理论对当今基础教育课程改革的影响。
(2018年真题)关于一般性货币政策工具的说法,正确的有()。A.再贴现政策是
最新回复
(
0
)