首页
登录
职称英语
Recently government agencies in some big cities have been studying the possi
Recently government agencies in some big cities have been studying the possi
游客
2023-11-03
70
管理
问题
Recently government agencies in some big cities have been studying the possibility of putting a "pollution tax" on private cars. The amount of tax private car owners would have to pay would depend on the emission levels, i. e. engine or vehicle size. This has caused quite a stir among the public. Some regard it as an effective way to control the number of cars and reduce pollution in the city. But others don’t think so. What is your opinion?
Write on ANSWER SHEET THREE a composition of about 200 words on the following topic:
Should Private Car Owners Be Taxed for Pollution?
You are to write in three parts.
In the first part, state specifically what your opinion is.
In the second part, provide one or two reasons to support your opinion.
In the last part, bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary.
Marks will be awarded for content, organization, language and appropriateness. Failure to follow the instructions may result in a loss of marks. [2011年真题]
选项
答案
Should Private Car Owners Be Taxed for Pollution?
Nowadays, an increasing number of Chinese people own their private cars, so putting a " pollution tax" on private cars has become a hot topic among the public. Some people are in favor of this idea while others are against it. As far as I am concerned, private car owners should be taxed for pollution, for it is an effective measure to protect our environment.
First of all, levying the pollution tax can reduce the number of private cars greatly. Accordingly, the carbon emissions will be reduced owing to the decreased number of private cars. As a result, the serious air pollution in the city can be effectively controlled. Moreover, the heavy traffic pressure on the city will be relieved effectively as a result of the reduction of private cars. Thus, our living environment will be greatly improved.
In addition, considering travel costs, most private car owners will be willing to choose "green travel". For example, they will he inclined to choose public transport, cycling and other green travel ways.
All in all, there are more and more environmental and social problems caused by the growing number of private cars, and it is high time that we protected our environment. Therefore, levying the pollution tax on private car owners is a proper and effective measure to control the number of cars and reduce pollution in the city.
解析
本题要求考生论述是否应该向私家车主征收污染税。近年来,随着我国经济迅速发展,越来越多的人开始拥有汽车,由此产生的一系列环境问题引起了人们的广泛关注,因此这个话题对考生来说并不陌生。对于该题目,考生首先应根据个人见解选择一种立意:第一种是论述应该征收污染税。私家车越来越多,产生了很多问题,征税可以起到一定的遏制作用;第二种是论述不应该征收污染税。具体到文章的结构安排,根据题目要求,首先可以引出征收污染税这个话题,然后提出自己对征收污染税的看法;接着根据立意阐述所选择的观点,比如,若选择论述私家车主应该被征收污染税,考生可论述征税可以减少私家车的数量,降低碳排放量,从而减轻空气污染,同时缓解交通拥堵,还可以使私家车主自觉地选择“绿色出行”等;最后总结全文,重申观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3153368.html
相关试题推荐
Thegovernmenthaspromisedtodo______liesinitspowertoeasethehardships
RecentlyaBJinformationcompanydidasurveyofstudentlifeamongmoreth
Thegovernmentisthinkingof______heavytaxesoncigarettestoraiseextrarev
Recentlygovernmentagenciesinsomebigcitieshavebeenstudyingthepossi
Noonecouldever______thisgovernmentofnotcaringaboutthepoor.A、accuseB、
Somepeoplethinktogetadegreeistheonlyimportantthingwhilestudying
Thegovernmentisnolongerpossibleto______allinformationandstifleevery
Thegovernmentisnolongerpossibleto______allinformationandstifleevery
Recently,therehavebeenmanyreportsonpeoplebeingblackmailedafterthe
Thegovernmentshoulddo______liesinitspowertoimprovethelivingstandard
随机试题
Thechairmanofthecompanysaidthatnewtechniqueshad______improvedtheirp
Thephrase"makeup"inparagraph2mostprobablymeans______.[br]Thebestti
TheNextDisaster:AreWeReady?AreWeReall
加德纳提出的智力理论是()。A.智力二因素 B.智力结构论 C.智力多元论
下列关于粘层施工技术的叙述,不正确的是()。A.半刚性基层使用慢裂石油沥青洒布
滤过除菌法适用于A.表面除菌B.无菌室的空气C.消毒D.不耐高热的制剂E.容器
以下关于口吃的说法错误的是( )。A.口吃为常见的言语障碍 B.患儿大多自卑
张某、方某共同出资9-12,分别设立甲公司和丙公司。2013年3月113,甲公司
骑车爱好者甲因一次交通意外致右腿重度伤残,无法再从事骑行活动,遂有意出售其两辆名
为了对项目目标进行动态跟踪和控制,在确定了项目目标计划值后的施工过程中,首先应做
最新回复
(
0
)