首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2023-10-10
25
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In Denmark, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor because______.
选项
A、the level of income disparity is relatively low
B、the purpose of taxing is to improve economy
C、the taxes aim at softening the shock of climate change
D、the taxes make products more expensive
答案
A
解析
由题干中的effects of health taxes,less hard on the poor定位到第四段第二句。该句指出因为丹麦收入差异相对较低,因此健康税对穷人的影响比其他国家小,由此可见A)最恰当。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3088881.html
相关试题推荐
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
SeniorAccountExecutive(总监)Atlanta,aleadingmarketing,design&prod
SeniorAccountExecutive(总监)Atlanta,aleadingmarketing,design&producti
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词you
随机试题
WhatawarddidthefilmBabelget?[originaltext]Californiagovernorandsup
[originaltext]Iamahealthpsychologist,andmyworkistohelppeoplebe
【T1】一年前,世界各国政府为今后15年商定了一项雄心勃勃的可持续发展议程。(agreeon)他们认识到,人民的需求不太复杂,但的确需要改变我们经济和社会的运
在国际税收中,常设机构利润范围的确定方法有()。A、分配法 B、归属法 C
A.评价和调整医务人员行为的准则 B.医德修养 C.医德教育 D.医德观念
目标能否实现的决定因素是()。A.组织 B.管理 C.措施
基金管理人对基金销售机构的业务规范和监督,不包括()。A.信息传输 B.投资
因共有关系消灭而分割共有财产时,在不损害财产的经济价值的前提下,不可以采取以下方
某患者因受情志刺激出现意志消沉、精神不振、气短胸闷、乏力懒言等症。根据七情内伤致
根据《规划环境影响评价条例》,对规划进行环境影响评价,应当分析、预测和评估的内容
最新回复
(
0
)