首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2023-10-10
71
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim,the major tax,Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3087740.html
相关试题推荐
健康是幸福的关键。只有健康的人才享受生活的乐趣。Healthisthekeytohappiness.Onlyahealthyman/perso
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
Thechildrenlooked(health)______withbrightsmilesontheirfaces.healthy本题
SeniorAccountExecutive(总监)Atlanta,aleadingmarketing,design&producti
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词you
随机试题
电线电缆的选择不合理的是()。A.对铜有腐蚀而对铝腐蚀相对较轻的环境、氨
有关排水系统的通气管作用叙述有误的是()。A.向排水管系统补给空气,平衡管道
A.补充低渗液和水分 B.补水或低渗液+利尿 C.补充等渗盐液 D.限水+
某同学做双缝干涉实验,开始两缝宽度相等,出现了清晰的干涉条纹;然后他将其中一缝的
患儿,7岁。乏力,时觉胸痛,憋气,纳差便调,咽红咳嗽,苔黄,脉浮数。其治则是A.
临床实验室测定血清胆固醇的常规方法是A.硫酸葡聚糖-酶沉淀法B.GPO-PAP法
动火执行人、监护人同时离开作业现场,间断时间超过( ),继续动火前,动火执行
在评估市场价值时,应遵循的原则包括( )。A.独立客观公正原则 B.谨慎原则
由于信息不对称,市场的一方不能观察到另一方的行动,则另一方就可能采取不利于对方的
(2020年真题)2×18年1月1日,甲公司以银行存款240万元购入一项专利技术
最新回复
(
0
)