首页
登录
职称英语
Public opinion is still largely unaware of or indifferent to the need to pre
Public opinion is still largely unaware of or indifferent to the need to pre
游客
2023-09-11
62
管理
问题
Public opinion is still largely unaware of or indifferent to the need to preserve rare species, whether for cultural or for scientific reasons. Some people indeed are actively hostile. Species have been dying out since life began, they argue, and have continuously been replaced by new species. Why, therefore, should we interfere with the process? Let us abandon to their fate the great Indian rhinoceros, the Arabian ostrich, the Tasmanian wolf, and all those other animals that cannot adapt themselves to the modern world. Others will arise to take their place.
But, of course, this argument has got its time-scale all wrong, It would take millions of years to evolve a set of new species to replace those we are now losing. In the meantime the world is filling up with the hardy and adaptable pests, rats and rabbits, starlings and house sparrows. The cultural argument for preserving wild life, that it is part of our natural heritage, argues itself, except to those who are blind to cultural values anyway, what is less obvious and more in need of explanation is the scientific case for preventing the extirpation of rare species.
In these days of torrential achievement in the physical sciences we are apt to forget that it is possible only because most of the basic thinking in the sciences has already been done. The seed has been sown and the fruit is now being harvested. Could that basic thinking have been brought to so triumphant a conclusion so early if the raw material, the fundamental physical phenomena, had been subjected to the sort of erosion and extinction that today constantly threatens the raw material of the biological sciences? Supposing the world stock of radium had gone the way of the dodo and the great auk by 1850. Who at that early date could have put up a sound argument in favor of conserving it if it had been known and in danger of destruction?
It is just this danger which now confronts the biological sciences, whose basic thinking is by no means yet done, but which hold the key to man’s achievement of a satisfactory mastery over both his nature and his nurture in the coming centuries. Animal and plants species are natural experiments in genetics and adaptation to environment that have taken millions of years to work out. Research as we may with fruit-flies, we can never catch up with nature. We have not the time. Is it not therefore folly to allow our vital experimental material to vanish through carelessness? [br] This passage aims to make the public aware of ______.
选项
答案
the importance to preserve the rare species
解析
文章先是说有人认为濒危物种不需保护,自然界自会产生新物种替代它们,后几段则反驳其论点并讲述了保护物种的重要性,文章的目的就应该是唤起大众保护物种的意识。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3004838.html
相关试题推荐
Opinionpollsarenowbeginningtoshowanunwillinggeneralagreementthat,
Opinionpollsarenowbeginningtoshowanunwillinggeneralagreementthat,
Opinionpollsarenowbeginningtoshowanunwillinggeneralagreementthat,
WhenitcomestopubliceducationintheUnitedStates,freemarketsandfle
WhenitcomestopubliceducationintheUnitedStates,freemarketsandfle
[audioFiles]audio_eusm_0099(20106)[/audioFiles]A、Publicmeansoftransportation
Admittedly,minoraccidentsandslip--upscontinuetoshakepublicconfidenc
Dailynewspaperhasaneditorialpage.Hereopinionisexpressedoneventsa
Dailynewspaperhasaneditorialpage.Hereopinionisexpressedoneventsa
Dailynewspaperhasaneditorialpage.Hereopinionisexpressedoneventsa
随机试题
Thegreatestrecentsocialchangeshavebeeninthelivesofwomen.Duringt
Four-year-oldchildrenambeingtestedfortheirabilitytorecognizesimple
[originaltext]W:Didyouturnoffthelightsandcheckthelocksonallthedoo
世界卫生组织提出的基本卫生保健的基本内容不包括( )。A.对重要保健问题进行宣
关于胎头径线以下说法错误的是A.临床上常用B型超声测双顶径判断胎儿大小 B.双
说话中枢位于()A.额上回后部 B.额中回后部 C.额下回后部 D
A.12%~17%B.11%~16%C.6%~9%D.4.5%~6%E.2%~5
如一栋建筑面积1200平米的房屋,已完成施工800平米,则其房屋竣工面积为800
下列关于信贷信息采集的内容说法错误的是()。A.数据报送环节:接入机构采用接口
期货交易所联网交易的,应当于决定之日起()日内报告中国证监会。A.5 B.1
最新回复
(
0
)