[originaltext] Have you ever had someone try to explain something to you a do

游客2023-08-08  22

问题  
Have you ever had someone try to explain something to you a dozen times with no luck, but then when you see a picture, the idea finally clicks? If that sounds familiar, maybe you might consider yourself a visual learner. Or, if reading or listening does the trick, maybe you feel like you’re a verbal learner. We call these labels learning styles. But is there really a way to categorize different types of students? Well, it actually seems that multiple presentation formats, especially if one of them is visual, help most people learn.
   When psychologists and educators test for learning styles, they’re trying to figure out whether these are inherent traits that affect how well students learn, instead of just a preference. Usually, they start by giving a survey to figure out what style a student favors, like visual or verbal learning. Then, they try to teach the students something with a specific presentation style, like using visual aids, and do a follow-up test to see how much they learned. That way, the researchers can see if the self-identified verbal learners really learned better when the information was just spoken aloud, for example.
   But, according to a 2008 review, only one study that followed this design found that students actually learned best with their preferred style. But the study had some big flaws. The researchers excluded two-thirds of the original participants because they didn’t seem to have any clear learning style from the survey at the beginning, and they didn’t even report the actual test scores in the final paper. So...it doesn’t really seem like learning styles are an inherent trait that we all have. But, that doesn’t mean that all students will do amazingly if they just spend all their time reading from a textbook.
   Instead, most people seem to learn better if they’re taught in several ways— especially if one is visual. In one study, researchers tested whether students remembered lists of words better if they heard them, saw them, or both. And everyone seemed to do better if they got to see the words in print, even the self-identified auditory learners. Their preference didn’t seem to matter. Similar studies tested whether students learned basic physics and chemistry concepts better by reading plain text or viewing pictures, too. And everyone did better with the help of pictures.
Question 16 to 18 are based on the recording you have just heard.
16. Why do psychologists and educators study learning styles?
17. What does the speaker say about one study mentioned in the 2008 review?
18. What message does the speaker want to convey about learning at the end of the talk?

选项 A、Auditory aids are as important as visual aids.
B、Visual aids are helpful to all types of learners.
C、Reading plain texts is more effective than viewing pictures.
D、Scientific concepts are hard to understand without visual aids.

答案 B

解析 细节归纳题。讲座最后提到,研究人员测试了学生在听到、看到或两者兼而有之时,是否能更好地记住单词列表。他们发现,如果看到打印出来的单词,每一个人的表现都似乎更好——即使是那些自认为是听觉学习者的人也是如此。他们的学习偏好似乎并不重要。类似的研究还测试了学生通过阅读纯文本或观看图片是否能更好地学习基本的物理和化学概念。结果表明,在图片的帮助下,每个人都做得更好。也就是说,视觉辅助对所有类型的学习者都有帮助。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2909400.html
最新回复(0)