首页
登录
职称英语
Over the past decade, American companies have tried hard to find ways to dis
Over the past decade, American companies have tried hard to find ways to dis
游客
2023-08-04
38
管理
问题
Over the past decade, American companies have tried hard to find ways to discourage senior managers from feathering their own nests at the expense of their shareholders. The three most popular reforms have been recruiting more outside directors in order to make boards more independent, linking bosses’ pay to various performance measure, and giving bosses share options so that they have the same long-term interests as their shareholders.
These reforms have been widely adopted by America’s larger companies, and surveys suggest that many more companies are thinking of following their lead. But have they done any good? Three papers presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management in Boston this week suggest not. As is usually the case with boardroom tinkering, the consequences have differed from those intended.
Start with those independent boards. On the face of it, dismissing the boss’s friends from the board and replacing them with outsiders looks a perfect way to make senior managers more accountable. But that is not the conclusion of a study by Professor James Westphal. Instead, he found that bosses with a boardroom full of outsiders spend much of their time building alliances, doing personal favors and generally pleasing the outsiders.
All too often, these
seductions
succeed. Mr. Westphal found that, to a remarkable degree, "independent" boards pursue strategies that are likely to favor senior managers rather than shareholders. Such companies diversify their business, increase the pay of executives and weaken the link between pay and performance.
To assess the impact of performance related pay, Mr. Westphal asked the bosses of 103 companies with sales of over $1 billion what measurements were used to determine their pay. The measurements varied widely, ranging from sales to earnings per share. But the researcher’s big discovery was that bosses attend to measures that affect their own incomes and ignore or play down other factors that affect a company’s overall success.
In short, bosses are quick to turn every imaginable system of corporate government to their advantage which is probably why they are the people who are put in charge of things. Here is a paradox for the management theorists: any boss who cannot beat a system designed to keep him under control is probably not worth having. [br] What is the purpose of the large companies recruiting more outside directors?
选项
A、To diversify the business of the corporations.
B、To increase the cooperation between the senior managers and the board directors.
C、To introduce effective reforms in business management.
D、To protect the benefit of the shareholders.
答案
D
解析
由题干关键词recruiting more outside directors定位至第一段。细节辨认题。定位段指出,在过去的10年里,美国公司竭力要找出方法阻止高级管理人员牺牲股东的利益谋取私利,从而采取了一些改革措施,故D“保护股东利益”为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2895589.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]StudentsinAmericanschoolslearnfromanearlyagetogive
[originaltext]StudentsinAmericanschoolslearnfromanearlyagetogive
[originaltext]Americanssufferfromanoverdoseofwork.Regardlessofwho
[originaltext]M:Somedecadesagomymotherwasreplacedbyacomputer.Herjob
A、ItisthemeetingpointofthePacificandtheNorthAmericanPlates.B、Itrun
[originaltext]AgrowingnumberofAmericanuniversitiesaredroppingtheen
[originaltext]AmericanIndiansgrewandsmokedtobaccobeforeColumbuscame
A、ItisthedreamoftheAmericantoleadacommonlife.B、Itisthehopeofthe
[originaltext]Theterm"Americandream"iswidelyusedtoday.Butwhatexac
A、theArtiepopulationsB、theNorthAmericansC、thenortheasternSiberiansD、the
随机试题
电影《一江春水向东流》的导演是()A.谢添 B.谢晋 C.谢铁骊 D.蔡楚
辩证否定观包括哪些内容?在对待中国传统文化的问题上如何坚持辩证否定观?
关于超标量技术,下列说法正确的是()。A.缩短原来流水线的处理器周期 B.在每
甲状腺功能亢进A.内分泌功能亢进 B.内分泌功能减退 C.内分泌功能正
与维持正常呼吸关系最密切的两脏是A.心与脾 B.脾与肾 C.肾与肝 D.肝
通过膜受体起调节作用的激素是A.性激素 B.糖皮质激素 C.甲状腺素 D.
长期使用有中毒风险,不推荐用于慢性肾病高磷血症的药物是()A.重组人促红素
合理报酬率定价是在限制资本收益率的基础上确定价格,但是会引起()。A.A效应
总监理工程师下达开工令的前提条件有()。A.设计交底和图纸会审已完成 B.施工
女,30岁。既往无甲亢病史,妊娠两个月时出现怕热、心悸、多汗。查体:甲状腺Ⅰ度肿
最新回复
(
0
)