首页
登录
职称英语
The Nanny State By the time they get to school, it’s
The Nanny State By the time they get to school, it’s
游客
2023-07-26
15
管理
问题
The Nanny State
By the time they get to school, it’s too late. The realisation that neglectful parenting in a child’s earliest years can ruin its chances for life is shaping a new, expensive and interventionist approach to families in Britain. The government has increased spending on financial support to children by 64%, to £ 24 billion( $ 41 billion), since Labour came to power in 1997. In the latest splurge, it announced an extra£ I billion for childcare, advice for struggling parents and cash benefits.
Intervention in infancy is increasingly popular in America and in Europe, among all shades of opinion. Most leftwingers accept that bad parenting is not only about poverty; most conservatives accept that working mothers are not its sole cause.
Disadvantage is clearly passed on early, and not just through the genes. There is evidence that, by the time they get to school, many dim two-year-olds from good homes have overtaken bright children from bad ones. Being read to, played with, properly fed and cuddled all hugely increase the likelihood of success in later life. Conversely, bad parenting increases the risk of everything from dropping out of school to illness, and eventually jail.
The problems are working out what to do and then making it happen. The British approach, under file overall title of Sure Start, has several strands. One, aimed at 400,000 children in the poorest fifth of the country, is, in effect, supplemental parenting: free places in high-quality nurseries and creches, coupled with energetic advice-giving, a new network of children’s centres, and home visits from volunteers. Then there is the general expansion of nursery’ education. Already every four-yearold has the right to 2hours of state-financed nursery care a day. In 2004 that will include three-year-olds.
Third is the plan to cut child poverty by a quarter by next year, and "end" it in 2020. But poverty, like cruelty, is hard to define. The government’s definition, based on 60% of the median income, is a shifting target: as earnings rise, so does poverty. Moreover, not all cash-strapped parents are bad at raising children.
Nonetheless, the government has energetically raised family benefits and tax credits. The poorest 20% of families with children, it says, will be £ 2,900 a year better off in real terms than before Labour took power in 1997. For single-earners with two or more children, policies are even more redistributive.
The money and effort that have gone into improving life for Britain’s infants are the government’s proudest boast—especially as other public-service reforms are looking increasingly tattered and battered. But problems lurk behind the determination. For a start, these policies are net necessarily compatible. Generous benefits distort the labour market and may encourage feckless behaviour. Frank Field, an iconoclastic Labour MP, notes that benefits for single mothers penalise those in stable relationships, which are clearly associated with good parenting.
Encouraging mothers of young children to find jobs is another good thing: it benefits both them and the family budget. But if it means their children are dumped in front of the telly at a cheap childminder, the kids may be worse off than if they were at hone with mum.
The government’s unwillingness to pass judgment on bad parents also weakens this approach. The rhetoric around Sure Start is swathed with waffle about "inclusivity" and being "non-judgmental". "I don’t have the right to call someone a bad parent," says Jane Cole, a senior Sure Start adviser. Don’t blame parents, she says, but society. But studies of similar intervention in early childhood in America show it works best when programmes clearly tell parents what to do and why.
Sure Start has almost nothing to say about the benefits of reading aloud, or the perils of too mnch television. According to a sceptic close to the scheme, there is too much about boosting parents’ self-esteem and too little attention to making a real difference to children’s lives.
That leads on to the biggest question of all: whether this sort of intervention works. The statistical evidence from well-established programmes in America is at best mixed: the chihtren in greatest need tend to benefit least. A big study duc out in 2006 will answer the question definitively, but Krista Kafer of the Heritage Foundation, an American think-tank, fears that "all it really does is make us feel better as a society". Scandinavian countries have spent heavily on infants for decades, and the inheritance of disadvantage seems to have decreased—though it is difficult to prove that the two are connected. The British government’s splurge on children is based on the hope that they are. [br] Family planning in one of China’s basic national policies.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
C
解析
文中并未提到中国的计划生育政策。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2869847.html
相关试题推荐
Themainideaofthesebusinessschoolacademiesisappealing.Inawordwhe
Themainideaofthesebusinessschoolacademiesisappealing.Inawordwhe
Themainideaofthesebusinessschoolacademiesisappealing.Inawordwhe
Themainideaofthesebusinessschoolacademiesisappealing.Inawordwhe
Collegegraduatesarenowleavingschoolwithnotonlyadiploma,butalsow
Collegegraduatesarenowleavingschoolwithnotonlyadiploma,butalsow
Collegegraduatesarenowleavingschoolwithnotonlyadiploma,butalsow
Collegegraduatesarenowleavingschoolwithnotonlyadiploma,butalsow
[originaltext]Religiousandprivateschoolsreceivelittleornosupportfr
ItiscommonlybelievedintheUnitedStatesthatschooliswherepeoplego
随机试题
Earthquakesoftencausegreat(destroy)______tolifeandproperty.destruction本题
某公路工程项目,公开招标后按招标投标文件签订了施工合同,合同工期为12个月。当
表干法测定沥青混合料毛体积试验所用仪器与材料同水中重法相同()
为避免生物性损伤,在切断传播途径的防护措施中欠妥的是A.洗手 B.戴口罩 C
【教学过程】 (一)激趣导入 教师多媒体出示不同景别的摄影作品,引导学生欣赏并思考:大屏幕中展示的分别是何种景深的摄影作品?学生回顾上节课所学内容,回答
在正常分娩中,哪项动作可以使胎头矢状缝转变为与中骨盆及骨盆出口前后径一致A、内旋
关于运价里程,下列说法错误的有( )。 A.按照发站至到站间国铁正式营业线
某企业被认定为国家重点扶持的高新技术企业,2019年度实现技术转让所得700万元
(2021年真题)根据《药品召回管理办法》,关于药品召回的说法,错误的是A.按照
下列材料中,块小、造价低,主要用作室内地面铺装的材料是( )。A.花岗岩 B.
最新回复
(
0
)