首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext]The Food and Drug Administration is, again, threatening to impose
[originaltext]The Food and Drug Administration is, again, threatening to impose
游客
2023-07-20
38
管理
问题
The Food and Drug Administration is, again, threatening to impose milk and meat from cloned animals on a public that opposes the technology and its products.
Respected polls report that more than 60% of Americans think animal cloning is immoral, and that most people said they wouldn’t knowingly eat the products even if the FDA approved them. But because the FDA would allow cloned meat and milk to be sold without identifying labels, consumers wouldn’t be able to avoid them. The FDA has consistently tilted toward those who want cloned milk and meat in our food. Agency officials have repeatedly asserted that science shows cloned milk and meat are safe for humans. But the FDA has never published the complete scientific studies it says support that claim.
The argument that cloning is safe for animals is unconvincing. Cloned meat and milk offer no public economic benefits. Having cloned cows produce more milk wouldn’t reduce milk prices. U.S. farmers produce more milk than we drink, and the government is required to buy the surplus. Since 2000, dairy support programs have cost taxpayers more than $5 billion.
Most important, this first decision to advance animal biotechnology raises ethical issues beyond the FDA’s expertise. Techniques used to clone animals will advance the ability to clone humans — and create animals with human genes. Neither the agency nor animal scientists are qualified to tell us whether and when it is ethically acceptable for humans to alter the essential nature of animals. We need a national discussion, including ethicists and religious leaders, to consider the wisdom of cloned and transgenic animals. Given the risk of unintended consequences, we should proceed cautiously. The president should halt further FDA action on cloning and set in motion a process for beginning this broader discussion.
Questions 26 to 29 are based on the passage you have just heard.
26. What is the speaker’s attitude towards cloning?
27. Why do many people in U.S. buy cloned foods?
28. Which statement is true according to the passage?
29. What do we know about cloning technique from the passage?
选项
A、Because the FDA approved them.
B、Because they cannot read the labels.
C、Because they support the new technique.
D、Because they cannot tell which one is the cloned food.
答案
D
解析
问题询问美国许多人购买克隆食品的原因。短文中提到,But because the FDA would allow cloned meat and milk to be sold…wouldn’t be able to avoid them由此可知,答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2853373.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Haveyoufoundanythingwrongwithmyteeth?M:Notyet.I’mstil
[originaltext]W:Haveyoufoundanythingwrongwithmyteeth?M:Notyet.I’mstil
[originaltext]W:Haveyoufoundanythingwrongwithmyteeth?M:Notyet.I’mstil
[originaltext]W:Haveyoufoundanythingwrongwithmyteeth?M:Notyet.I’mstil
[originaltext]W:Haveyoufoundanythingwrongwithmyteeth?M:Notyet.I’mstil
[originaltext]Therewasonceamanwhospentallhistimeinhisglasshouse
[originaltext]Therewasonceamanwhospentallhistimeinhisglasshouse
[originaltext]M:You’remycampaignmanager,Julie.HowdoIconvincememberso
[originaltext]W:IsawareallyinterestingprogramonTVlastnight.Ittalked
[originaltext]W:IsawareallyinterestingprogramonTVlastnight.Ittalked
随机试题
Ifonlythecommittee______theregulationsandputthemintoeffectassoonas
Withtheeffectsofglobalization,increasesintechnologyandthepaceof
Itisaknownfactthatphysicalactivityimprovesoverallhealth.Notonly
MarsfascinatesscientistsbecauseofitssimilaritytoEarth,anditfasci
哲学物质范畴同自然科学的物质结构理论的关系是()A.整体与部分的关系 B.一般
A. B. C. D.
《医疗事故处理条例》第四条规定:发生导致3人以上人身损害后果的重大医疗过失行为,
任何金融工具都可能出现价格的不利变动而带来资产损失的可能性,这是()。A
场内证券交易实行分级结算,()接受投资者委托达成证券交易,并承担证券或资金的交
知荣明耻,人之根本。荣誉和耻辱,是荣辱观中的一对基本范畴,是指社会对人们行为褒贬
最新回复
(
0
)