首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2023-07-05
56
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science, it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment(启蒙运动)to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering(迷惑)seems the way ahead.
It is this sudden confrontation(对抗)with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] According to the passage, which one about scientists in earlier times is Not true?
选项
A、They invented stories to explain things they didn’ t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know how things worked.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
推断题。关于早期科学家的说法在文中的第三段,A、B、D三个选项是对第三段科学家三种作为的转述,只有C不是早期科学家的作为,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2811421.html
相关试题推荐
Thepredictabilityofourmortalityratesissomethingthathaslongpuzzled
Thepredictabilityofourmortalityratesissomethingthathaslongpuzzled
TheUnitedStates’predominanceinscienceandtechnologyisfading,arepor
TheUnitedStates’predominanceinscienceandtechnologyisfading,arepor
TheUnitedStates’predominanceinscienceandtechnologyisfading,arepor
TheUnitedStates’predominanceinscienceandtechnologyisfading,arepor
TheUnitedStates’predominanceinscienceandtechnologyisfading,arepor
ConradHiltonreallywantedtobeabanker.Instead,hesuccessfullychanged
ConradHiltonreallywantedtobeabanker.Instead,hesuccessfullychanged
ConradHiltonreallywantedtobeabanker.Instead,hesuccessfullychanged
随机试题
[originaltext]London,theUnitedKingdomTheUKhousingmarketisseeinga
Ifyou’reoneofthosepeoplewhotendstoputonweightaroundyourmiddle,
请根据以下内容给香港航空公司写信预订机票。本公司营业部主任陈先生定于6月19日抵达波士顿,逗留数日后,将继续前往渥太华。敬请贵公司保留6月24日
常微分方程2y2sinxcosxdx+(2ysin2x+3y2)dy=0
给水引入管与排水排出管的水平净距不得小于()m。A.1 B.1.5 C.2
下列哪种情况下,首选异丙肾上腺素A.传染病引起心搏骤停 B.药物中毒引起心搏骤
继发性甲状腺功能减退时,甲状腺激素的含量变化是A.T,T升高,TSH下降B.T,
患者,男性,50岁,胃大部切除术后第一天。患者生命体征平稳,伤口无渗出血,禁食,
现在由90%的人过于关注食品安全问题,对于营养的理解,大多数人还停留在“营养问题
下列哪一项不属于“推定医疗机构有过错”的情形?A.违反法律、行政法规、规章以及其
最新回复
(
0
)