首页
登录
职称英语
Big is Back A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now t
Big is Back A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now t
游客
2023-07-02
34
管理
问题
Big is Back
A) Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now they have the advantage again. In 1996, in one of his most celebrated phrases, Bill Clinton declared that "the era of big government is over". He might have added that the era of big companies was over, too. The organisation that defined capitalism for much of the 20th century was then in retreat, attacked by corporate raiders, annoyed by shareholders and outwitted by entrepreneurs (企业家). Great names such as Pan Am had disappeared. Others had survived only by huge bloodletting: IBM sacked 122,000 people, a quarter of its workforce, between 1990 and 1995. Everyone agreed that the future lay with entrepreneurial start-ups such as Yahoo! —which in late 1998 had the same market capitalisation with 637 employees as Boeing with 230,000. The share of GDP produced by big industrial companies fell by half between 1974 and 1998, from 36% to 17%.
B) Today the balance of advantage may be shifting again. To a degree, the financial crisis is responsible. It has destroyed the venture-capital market, the lifeblood of many young firms. Governments have been rescuing companies they consider too big to fail, such as Citigroup and General Motors. Recession is squeezing out smaller and less well-connected firms. But there are other reasons too, which are giving big companies a self-confidence they have not displayed for decades.
C) Of course, big companies never went away. There were still plenty of first-rate ones: Unilever and Toyota continued to innovate through thick and thin. And not all start-ups were models of success: Netscape and Enron promised to revolutionise their industries only to crash and burn. Nevertheless, the balance had shifted in favour of small organisations. The entrepreneurial boom was supercharged by two developments. Deregulation (撤销管制规定) opened protected markets. Some national champions, such as AT&T, were broken up. Others saw their markets eaten up by swift-footed newcomers. The arrival of the personal computer in the 1970s and the internet in the 1990s created an army of successful start-ups. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak founded Apple Computer in 1976 in the Jobs family’s garage. Microsoft and Dell Computer were both founded by teenagers (in 1975 and 1984 respectively). Larry Page and Sergey Brin started Google in Stanford dorm rooms.
D) But deregulation had already begun to go out of fashion before the financial crisis. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, introduced after Enron collapsed in disgrace, increased the regulatory burden on companies of all sizes, but what could be borne by the big could cripple the small. Many of today’s most dynamic industries are much more friendly to big companies than the IT industry. Research in biotechnology is costly and often does not bear fruit for years. Natural-resource companies, whose importance grows as competition for resources intensifies, need to be big—hence the mining industry’s consolidation.
E) Two further developments are shifting the balance of advantage in favour of size. One is a heightened awareness of the risks of subcontracting (转包合同). Toy companies and pet-food firms alike have found that their brands can be hurt if their suppliers turn out goods of poor quality. Big industrial companies have learned that their production cycles can be broken up if contractors are not up to the mark. Boeing, once a champion of subcontracting, has been forced to take over slow suppliers. A second is the emergence of companies that have discovered how to be entrepreneurial as well as big. These giants are getting better at minimising the costs of size (such as longer, more complex chains of managerial command) while exploiting its advantages (such as presence in several markets and access to a large talent pool). Cisco Systems is pioneering the use of its own video technology to improve communications between its employees. IBM has carried out several company-wide brainstorming exercises, recently involving more than 150,000 people, that have encouraged it to put more emphasis, for example, on green computing. Disney has successfully taken Pixar’s creative magic.
F) You might suppose that the return of the mighty, now better equipped to crush the competition, is something to worry about. Not necessarily. Big is not always ugly just as small is not always beautiful. Most entrepreneurs dream of turning their start-ups into giants (or at least of selling them to giants for a fortune). There is a symbiosis (互利合作关系) between large and small. "Cloud computing" would not provide young firms with access to huge amounts of computer power if big companies had not created giant servers. Biotech start-ups would go bust were they not given work by giants with deep pockets.
G) The most successful economic ecosystems contain a variety of big and small companies: Silicon Valley boasts long-established names as well as an ever-changing array of start-ups. America’s economy has been more dynamic than Europe’s in recent decades not just because it is better at giving birth to companies but also because it is better at letting them grow. Only 5% of European Union companies born since 1980 have made it into the list of the 1,000 biggest in the EU by market capitalisation. In America, the figure is 22%.
H) The return of the giants could well be a blessing for the world economy—but only if business people and policymakers avoid certain mistakes. Businesses should not admire size blindly, particularly if this means diversifying into a lot of unrelated areas. The model of joint business may be tempting when cash is hard to find. But the moment will not last. By and large, the most successful big firms focus on their core businesses.
I) Policymakers should both resist an instinctive suspicion of big companies and avoid the old error of embracing national champions. It is bad enough that governments have diverted resources into supporting failing companies such as General Motors. It would be even more regrettable if they were to return to picking winners. The best use of their energies is to remove the burdens and barriers which prevent entrepreneurs from starting businesses and turning small companies into big ones. [br] The deregulation policy and numerous successful start-ups created by personal computer have help boosted the entrepreneurial boom.
选项
答案
C
解析
本题的关键词是entrepreneurial boom“创业潮”。与此相关的信息在C段。该段第5句提到有两件事情加速了“创业潮”。一是管制规定的撤销开放了受保护的市场,二是由个人电脑及网络的诞生造就的一大批成功的新企业。本题是对这两个因素的概括。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2801764.html
相关试题推荐
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowt
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
BigisBackA)Corporategiantswereonthedefensivefordecades.Nowth
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Hey,Mike!DidyouattendMr.Johnson’sseminarontheHistory
Thepriceofwheatissettinganall-timehighintheUnitedKingdom.Food【C
甲对同事乙心怀不满,向其他同事发送电子邮件,捏造乙有生活作风问题,同事议论纷纷,
半导体锗和硅都是四价元素,在原子结构的最外层都是()个电子。A.2 B.3
戊型肝炎主要传播途径是A、输血 B、性交 C、粪-口途径 D、蚊虫叮咬
硫酸-荧光反应为地西泮的特征鉴别反应之一。地西泮加硫酸溶解后,在紫外光灯下显A.
下列鉴别试验中属于巴比妥鉴别反应的是A:水解反应 B:硫酸反应 C:戊烯二醛
对不再作为药品使用的麻醉药品和精神药品A.国务院药品监督管理部门应当撤销其药品批
(共用题干)患者女,67岁,孕4产3。有产钳助产史。诉腰骶部酸痛数年,近2年来加
威化商标是《保护工业产权巴黎公约》甲成员国L公司在甲国注册商标,在甲国为驰名商标
最新回复
(
0
)