Text 1 They are falling like dominoes.Ex

练习题库2022-08-02  12

问题 Text 1 They are falling like dominoes.Executives caught behaving badly might once have been slapped on the wrist.Today they are shown the door.On July 19th Paramount Television fired its president,Amy Powell,over reports of insensitive comments about race.This is only the latest bigwig to go in a line of departures linked to"personal misconduct"."Boards are now holding executives to higher standards,looking not just at how they treat people but also how they talk to and about them,"says Pam Jeffords of Mercer,a consultancy.The thread connecting these incidents is that all are about perceptions of executive integrity,and by extension,trust.Since trust violations are particularly hard for firms to overcome,often more so than incompetence,firms may believe that firing an errant executive can be the safest,most pragmatic course of action.Executives were never alt angels.What has changed is that boards are now far less willing to overlook bad behaviour for the sake of superior performance.A 2017 report from PwC,a professional-services firm,found that the share of chief-executive dismissals that were due to ethical lapses increased between 2007-11 and 2012-2016,not because bosses were behaving worse but because they were held more accountable.Boards seem to be acting thus for two reasons.First,to protect employees and create a safe and inclusive work environment.Second,to protect their brands'reputations.A 2016 study from researchers at Stanford showed that the fallout from chief executives behaving badly,but not unlawfully,was large and lasting.On average each of the 38 incidents studied garnered 250 news stories,with media attention lasting 4.9 years.Shares usually suffered,though not always.And in a third of cases firms faced further damage,including loss of major clients and federal investigations.Should an executive's words be judged as harshly as their actions?From the perspective of protecting the brand,as well as discouraging a toxic work environment,they probably should.The power of social media to turn a whispered comment into a Twitterstorm,and the fact that everyone now has a mobile recording device,demands a decisive response.But boards and the media also risk rushing to judgment and painting the wicked with too broad a brush.An insensitive remark made long ago or as a one-off is not the same as one made as the face of the firm or as part of a consistent pattern.Disney's firing of James Gunn,a director,last week over tweets from a decade ago,before he was hired and for which he has apologised,seems to be one instance in which such distinctions have been papered over.And plenty of companies benefit from environments where people can speak openly and brainstorm out loud.Once the fallen dominos have been counted,some firms may turn out to have been too gung-ho in responding to the"Weinstein effect".Many,perhaps most,exits will be justified.But all?The phrase"slapped on the wrist"(Line 2,Para.1)is closest in meaning to_____A.given an easy penaltyB.forced to resignC.despised by the publicD.arrested by the police

选项 A.given an easy penalty
B.forced to resign
C.despised by the public
D.arrested by the police

答案 A

解析 【信息锁定】首先由once.…Today可判断第一段②③句中,slapped on the wrist和shown the door构成今昔对比,说明商管被抓到行为不端时(caught behaving badly)所受惩罚的变化。再由后文可知.shown the door意为“被开除/被迫辞职(fired、departures)”.对高管来说是一种严惩。故可推断所考词slapped on the wrist意为“被施以轻罚”,A.正确。【解题技巧】B.与文中fired.departures.to go等同义,却是与所考词含义相反的shown the door同义。C.、D.为脱离上下文语境的主观推导:考生可能会主观认为“高管既然被抓到行为不端,那么很可能会被公众鄙视、或被警察逮捕”.但首段讨论集中在“董事会/公司”范围内,未涉及“公众态度”或“法律惩罚”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/xueli/2699598.html

最新回复(0)