首页
登录
职称英语
People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors a
People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors a
游客
2025-03-21
60
管理
问题
People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed. It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not, or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.
Social scientists are, of course, extremely interested in these types of questions. They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors. There are no clear answers yet, but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed. As one might expect, the two approaches are very different from one another, and there is a great deal of debate between proponents of each theory. The controversy is often referred to as "nature/nurture".
Two who support the "nature" side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological and genetic factors. That our environment has little, if anything, to do with our abilities, characteristics, and behavior is central to this theory. Taken to an extreme, this theory maintains that our behavior is predetermined to such a degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.
Proponents of the "nurture" theory, or as they are often called, behaviorists, claimed that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act. A behaviorist, B. F. Skinner, sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings. The behaviorists’ view of the human being is quite mechanistic; they maintain that, like machines, humans respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior.
Neither of these theories can yet fully explain human behavior. In fact, it is quite likely that the key to our behavior lies somewhere between these two extremes. That the controversy will continue for a long time is certain. [br] Concerning the nature/nurture controversy, the writer of this article______.
选项
A、supports the nature theory
B、supports the nurture theory
C、believes both are completely wrong
D、thinks that the correct explanation of human behavior will take ideas from both theories
答案
D
解析
本题涉及作者的观点。问关于本性论和教养论,本文作者的看法是什么。根据文章最后一段,作者指出两种理论都不能圆满地解释人类的行为。事实上,对这一问题解释的关键很可能存在于这两个极端理论之间。不过这两种相互矛盾的理论肯定还会存在很长时间。所以,作者的观点是:对人类行为的正确解释应该借鉴两种不同理论中的正确观点。因此,本题的正确答案应是D。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4006934.html
相关试题推荐
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketota
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketota
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketota
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketota
40yearsagotheideaofdisabledpeopledoingsportwasneverheardof.But
40yearsagotheideaofdisabledpeopledoingsportwasneverheardof.But
Thereareplacesintheworldwherepeoplearealleged(被认为)tolivemuchlo
Thereareplacesintheworldwherepeoplearealleged(被认为)tolivemuchlo
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.
随机试题
WherewouldThomasprobablygo?[br][originaltext]W:Goodafternoon.Today,we
WhendidscientistscometorealizehowtheatomsandmoleculesontheEarthmos
[originaltext]W:Therestaurantdoesn’tseemtogetenoughcustomers.Ithinkt
ARDS特征性病理变化是()A.肺表面活性物质的数量增加 B.肺表面活性物质的
老王82岁,癌症晚期,妻子比她小2岁(80岁),老王平时极有权威。三个儿子和夫妇
狂犬病毒是一种A.DNA病毒 B.双链RNA病毒 C.单股负链RNA病毒
关于有限合伙企业的说法正确的是()。A.合伙协议没有约定的,有限合伙人将其在合
石灰稳定土基层施工期间的日最低气温为()。A、0℃ B、5℃ C、10
1.试分析目前公司面临的舆论环境。
甲与乙结婚以后,乙未经甲之同意,擅自人流,为此引起矛盾,导致离婚,甲的下列请求
最新回复
(
0
)