首页
登录
职称英语
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
游客
2025-01-19
40
管理
问题
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only four years as a physicist at Bell Laboratories, Schon, 32, had co-authored 90 scientific papers—one every 16 days-detailing new discoveries in superconductivity, lasers, nanotechnology and quantum physics. This output astonished his colleagues, and made them
suspicious
. When one co-worker noticed that the same table of data appeared in two separate papers—which also happened to appear in the two most prestigious scientific journals in the world, Science and Nature—the jig was up. In October 2002, a Bell Labs investigation found that Schon had falsified and
fabricated
data. His career as a scientist was finished. Scientific scandals, which are as old as science itself, tend to follow similar patterns of due reward.
In recent years, of course, the pressure on scientists to publish in the top journals has increased, making the journals much more crucial to career success. The questions are whether Nature and Science have become too powerful as arbiters of what science reaches to the public, and whether the journals are up to their task as gatekeepers.
Each scientific specialty has its own set of journals. Physicists have Physical Review Letters, neuroscientists have Neuron, and so forth. Science and Nature, though, are the only two major journals that cover the gamut of scientific disciplines, from meteorology and zoology to quantum physics and chemistry. As a result, journalists look to them each week for
the cream of the crop
of new science papers. And scientists look to the journals in part to reach journalists. Why do they care? Competition for grants has gotten so fierce that scientists have sought popular renown to gain an edge over their rivals. Publication in specialized journals will win the
acclaims
from academics and satisfy the publish-or-perish imperative, but Science and Nature come with the added bonus of potentially getting your paper written up in The New York Times and other publications.
Scientists tend to pay more attention to the big two than to other journals. When more scientists know about a particular paper, they’re more apt to cite it in their own papers. Being oft-cited will increase a scientist’s "Impact Factor", a measure of how often papers are cited by peers. Funding agencies use the "Impact Factor" as a rough measure of the influence of scientists they’re considering supporting. [br] The word "acclaims" underlined in Paragraph 3 refers to________.
选项
A、compliment
B、prize
C、bonus
D、core
答案
A
解析
acclaims在此处作名词,意为“赞扬,欢呼”,因此A项“赞美,称赞”最为接近。B项“奖品,奖赏”、C项“红利;意外收获”和D项“核心”均不符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3919097.html
相关试题推荐
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
随机试题
OneafternoonIwassittingatmyfavoritetableinarestaurant,waitingfo
[img]2012q2/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_0733_20124[/img][br]Accordingtotheprofesso
Rockmusichasbeenaccusedofhavingabeatthatisatoncetoostrongand
Text2Aslawmakersfightoverwhatcond
运营隧道定期检查频率宜为(),最长不得超过()。 A.6月/次;1年/次B
新生儿窒息复苏最关键的措施是A.保持呼吸道通畅 B.建立呼吸,增加通气 C.
关于残疾人社会工作,以下表述错误的是()。A.残疾人社会工作就是一般的残疾人服
对饱和松砂地基,宜采用()处理来提高抗液化能力。 A.振动压密法B.重锤夯
某男,7岁,患上呼吸道感染,症见发热,恶风,微有汗出,咳嗽咳痰,咳喘气促,证
当工程施工的实际进度与计划进度不符合时,需要对网络计划作出调整,下列不属于调整的
最新回复
(
0
)