首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
游客
2024-12-24
33
管理
问题
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus—the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £ 30—though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1, 286 in every 10, 000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $ 200 or lose $ 100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch. Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] According to the passage, the human brain can be described as
选项
A、irrational.
B、oblivious.
C、disorderly.
D、capricious.
答案
D
解析
细节题。由the human brain定位至第四段首句“After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty,easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness.”。句中nighty意为“反复无常的”,与capricious“善变的,反复无常的”含义相同,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3882331.html
相关试题推荐
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
Scienceisawayofthinkingmuchmorethanitisabodyofknowledge.Itsg
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
随机试题
Theroboticsrevolutionissettobringhumansfacetofacewithanoldfear
【B1】[br]【B8】A、potentialB、performanceC、preferenceD、passionA本题测试形容词的用法。poten
TherehavebeenalotofreportsthatboysareintroubleinAmericaneducat
水利工程工程费用由下列部分组成( )。A.工程费、管理费、预备费 B.建安工
某女,少腹隐痛不休,带下增多,大便时结时溏,时有低热,舌苔薄,脉虚弦。妇科检查:
红外线疗法的禁忌证包括A.急性化脓性炎症 B.恶性肿瘤 C.出血倾向 D.
患者,女,32岁。有甲状腺功能亢进症病史。颈前肿胀,烦躁易怒,易饥多食,恶热多汗
不属于严重药品不良反应的是A.服用药品导致死亡B.服用药品危及生命C.服用药品致
戏剧小组由打工的妇女们组成,以娱乐活动来增加她们的生活乐趣。工作员经过社区调查了
在标的物合同履行管理过程中,( )向采购人领导层提供关于卖方正在如何完成合同目
最新回复
(
0
)