首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
游客
2024-12-24
35
管理
问题
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus—the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £ 30—though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1, 286 in every 10, 000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $ 200 or lose $ 100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch. Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] In his experiments, the subjects______Mr. Kahneman’s proof of their errors.
选项
A、can identify with
B、turn a deaf ear to
C、feel aversion to
D、are overjoyed to hear about
答案
B
解析
细节题。由题干中的proof of their errors定位至末段。第二句指出“When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors,the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up,but confused silence,followed by business as usual.”,这里指出卡内曼拿出确凿证据证明实验者的错误时,他们非常困惑地保持了沉默,紧接着,一切又回归原样。可见[B]“置若罔闻”符合文意,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3882333.html
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothenewsitem,thisyearIraqwouldbantheimmunitytowards[br]
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
WartimeAmericandiplomacylargelywasAmericandiplomacytowards______.A、German
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B19】A、liftB、lostC、laidD、leftD那个男的把手提包遗留在了车里。left…behind留下,遗留;lift
人权是法的源泉,法是人权的体现和保障。人权与国家法律之间存在不可分割的关系,两者
最常用于胰腺癌辅助诊断及术后随访指标的实验室检查项目是A.CEA.B.AFP
以下疾病常有晕厥发作并可能猝死A.预激综合征 B.肥厚型心肌病 C.室间隔缺
女,10岁。诊断为先天性肌斜颈,不需要与哪项病理相鉴别A.锁骨骨折 B.先
新课程改革强调将学生学习知识的过程转化为形成正确价值观的过程,其价值观是指()。
A.未曾在中国境内上市销售的药品 B.已有国家药品标准的药品 C.改变给药途
关于梗死的描述,不正确的是 A.动脉痉挛促进梗死形成 B.梗死多由动脉阻塞引
甲家盖房,邻居乙、丙前来帮忙。施工中,丙因失误从高处摔下受伤,乙不小心撞伤小孩丁
下列不属于雌激素禁忌证的是A.乳腺癌 B.生殖系统恶性肿瘤 C.儿童禁用
最新回复
(
0
)